Effect of oral versus transdermal steroidal contraceptives on androgenic markers

被引:32
|
作者
White, T [1 ]
Jain, JK [1 ]
Stanczyk, FZ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
sex hormone-binding; globulin; androgens; testosterone; oral contraceptives; contraceptive patch;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.067
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare biochemical androgen profiles in women treated with the contraceptive patch versus an oral contraceptive (OC). Study design: Twenty-four healthy women were randomly assigned to receive 3 cycles of either the contraceptive patch (ethinyl estradiol [EE] 20 mu g/d and norelgestromin 150 mu g/d) or OC (EE 35 mu g and norgestimate 250 mu g). Blood samples were taken at baseline and end of treatment. Serum levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), total testosterone (T), androstenedione (A), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and 3 alpha-androstanediol glucuronide (3 alpha-diol G) were quantified by immunoassay methods; free T was calculated. The paired t and Student t tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Nineteen women completed the study (patch, n = 10; OC, n = 9). Despite a 1.6-fold relative increase in SHBG levels with the patch versus CC (449% vs 274%, P =.03), free T decreased equally in both groups (patch 60%, P <.0001; OC 59%, P <.0001). DHEAS decreased by 26% in the patch group (P <.01) and 32% in the OC group (P <.001). 3 alpha-diol G was reduced by 52% in the patch group (P <.0001) and 51% in the OC group (P <.0001). In addition, the OC was associated with significant decreases in A and DHT. Conclusion: The contraceptive patch had an effect comparable to the OC on several key androgenic markers. Given these biochemical findings, the contraceptive patch has significant potential as a therapeutic agent for disorders of androgen excess. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2055 / 2059
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of oral versus transdermal steroidal contraceptives on androgenic markers.
    White, T
    Jain, JK
    Ozel, B
    Stanczyk, FZ
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR GYNECOLOGIC INVESTIGATION, 2005, 12 (02) : 312A - 312A
  • [2] Effect of low-dose oral contraceptives on androgenic markers and acne
    Thorneycroft, IH
    Stanczyk, FZ
    Bradshaw, KD
    Ballagh, SA
    Nichols, M
    Weber, ME
    CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 60 (05) : 255 - 262
  • [3] Oral contraceptives and androgenic symptoms
    Kuhl, H
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1999, 59 (05) : 191 - 198
  • [4] EFFECT OF ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES ON PLASMA ANDROGENIC STEROIDS AND THEIR PRECURSORS
    FERN, M
    ROSE, DP
    FERN, EB
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1978, 51 (05): : 541 - 544
  • [5] Effects of oral versus transdermal hormonal contraceptives on coagulation factors.
    Johnson, JV
    Lowell, J
    Cushman, M
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR GYNECOLOGIC INVESTIGATION, 2005, 12 (02) : 310A - 310A
  • [6] PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ORAL STEROIDAL CONTRACEPTIVES
    HOBEL, CJ
    MISHELL, DR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1968, 101 (07) : 994 - &
  • [7] Effect of transdermal versus oral estradiol substitution on the excretion of vasoactive markers in postmenopausal women
    Mueck, AO
    Seeger, H
    Lippert, TH
    GYNAKOLOGISCH-GEBURTSHILFLICHE RUNDSCHAU, 2000, 40 (02): : 61 - 67
  • [8] Effect of oral vs. transdermal contraceptives on ethinyl estradiol levels
    Johnson, Julia V.
    Casson, Peter R.
    Gentzschein, Elizabet
    Stancyk, Frank Z.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2008, 15 (02) : 295A - 296A
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of oral and transdermal contraceptives
    Zaliska, O.
    Pushak, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : A247 - A248
  • [10] Effects of the contraceptive vaginal ring, the contraceptive transdermal patch and combined oral contraceptives on markers of hemostasis
    van Vliet, Huib A. A. M.
    Rosendaal, Frits R.
    Fleischer, Kathrin
    Rosing, Jan
    Helmerhorst, Frans M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 81 (01) : 88 - 89