International firm activities, R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms

被引:22
|
作者
Bhattacharya, Mita [1 ]
Okafor, Luke Emeka [2 ]
Pradeep, V [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Econ, Caulfield 3145, Australia
[2] Univ Nottingham, Malaysia Campus Jalan Broga, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
[3] Great Lakes Inst Management, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Trade; FDI; R&D intensity; Low-tech industries; High-tech industries; India; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; INTERMEDIATE INPUTS; PANEL-DATA; EXPORTS; TRADE; FDI; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2021.01.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether R&D intensity has a moderating effect on the links between international firm activities (viz. exports, trade in imported inputs and capital goods, and foreign direct investment) and productivity. We also explore whether the moderating effect of R&D intensity vis-= a-vis the underlying relationships differs for firms in high-tech versus low-tech sectors. The results show that, unlike low-tech firms, high-tech firms with higher R&D intensity in the previous period derive substantial productivity gains from FDI and the utilisation of imported inputs and capital goods. Furthermore, compared with internationally active high-tech firms, domestic high-tech firms have lower productivity gains from higher R&D intensity in the previous period, while the impact of higher R&D intensity on domestic low-tech firms is insignificant. Policies that create an enabling environment for public support for R&D, including the provision of R&D tax incentives targeted at internationally active high-tech firms, would help in enhancing productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] International Trade, R&D Spillovers and Productivity: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Industry
    Parameswaran, Mavannoor
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2009, 45 (08): : 1249 - 1266
  • [2] Multinationals, R&D, and productivity: evidence for UK manufacturing firms
    Anon Higon, Dolores
    Manjon Antolin, Miguel
    Manez, Juan A.
    INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2011, 20 (02) : 641 - 659
  • [3] R&D spillover and productivity growth: Evidence from Indian private firms
    Raut, LK
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1995, 48 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [4] Firm size and compositions of R&D expenditures: evidence from a panel of R&D performing manufacturing firms
    Choi, Joonhwan
    Lee, Jaegul
    INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2018, 25 (05) : 459 - 481
  • [5] Financing constraints and investments in R&D: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms
    Sasidharan, Subash
    Lukose, P. J. Jijo
    Komera, Surenderrao
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2015, 55 : 28 - 39
  • [6] Impact of R&D Intensity on the Firm Growth: Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Firms
    Lee, Jeong-Dong
    Han, Jeong-Sook
    Baek, Chul-Woo
    PICMET 2010: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2010,
  • [7] International Trade and R&D Investment: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms
    Zhou, Yixiao
    Song, Ligang
    CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2016, 24 (01) : 63 - 84
  • [8] Micro evidence of the effects of R&D on labour productivity for large international R&D firms
    Aldieri, L.
    Cincera, M.
    Garofalo, A.
    Vinci, C. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 2008, 29 (03) : 198 - 215
  • [9] University R&D and firm productivity: Evidence from Italy
    Medda G.
    Piga C.
    Siegel D.S.
    The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, 30 (1-2) : 199 - 205
  • [10] The role of wages, skills development and R&D on productivity: evidence from Thai manufacturing firms
    Amornkitvikai, Yot
    Harvie, Charles
    Sangkaew, Piyapong
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2022, : 324 - 342