Preferences, Comparative Advantage, and Compensating Wage Differentials for Job Routinization

I attempt to explain why there is not much evidence on compensating wage differentials for job disamenities. I focus on the match between workers' preferences for routine jobs and the variability in tasks associated with the job. Using data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, I find that mismatched workers earn lower wages and that both male and female workers in routinized jobs earn, on average, 5.5% and 7% less than their counterparts in non-routinized jobs. However, once preferences and mismatch are accounted for, this difference decreases to 2% for men, and 4% for women, not statistically significant in both cases.