Prediction of the rodent carcinogenicity of 60 pesticides by the DEREKfW expert system

被引:16
作者
Crettaz, P [1 ]
Benigni, R
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Off Publ Hlth, CH-3003 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Ist Super Sanita, Environm & Hlth Dept, Expt & Computat Carcinogenesis Unit, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci050150z
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The two-year rodent bioassay represents the golden standard for evaluating the carcinogenicity of chemicals. Because of practical and ethical reasons, alternative approaches have been investigated for many years. Among these approaches, the (quantitative) structure-activity relationships [(Q)SARs] offer promising perspectives for quickly screening a large number of chemicals. To increase the acceptance of (Q)SARs among the regulators, their predictive power needs to be scientifically validated. In this article, we tested the capacity of the DEREKfW expert system to qualitatively predict the rodent carcinogenicity and the genotoxic potential of 60 pesticides recently registered in Switzerland. The percentage of false negatives was found to be 31% for carcinogenicity. The associated sensitivity of 69% indicates that most of the pesticides with positive rodent bioassay results were detected by DEREKfW. On the other hand, the low specificity of 47% indicates that many pesticides may be flagged as carcinogenic while rodent bioassays would not confirm this potential. This may lead to unnecessary testing or the unnecessary restriction of a chemical.
引用
收藏
页码:1864 / 1873
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 89 ECETOC
[2]   The first US National Toxicology Program exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: Definitive results [J].
Benigni, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 1997, 387 (01) :35-45
[3]   Structure-activity relationship studies of chemical mutagens and carcinogens: Mechanistic investigations and prediction approaches [J].
Benigni, R .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2005, 105 (05) :1767-1800
[4]   The second National Toxicology Program comparative exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results [J].
Benigni, R ;
Zito, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2004, 566 (01) :49-63
[5]  
*BGVV, 2001, BGVV FORD NACHB KUEN
[6]   Comparison of the computer programs DEREK and TOPKAT to predict bacterial mutagenicity [J].
Cariello, NF ;
Wilson, JD ;
Britt, BH ;
Wedd, DJ ;
Burlinson, B ;
Gombar, V .
MUTAGENESIS, 2002, 17 (04) :321-329
[7]   Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances [J].
Cronin, MTD ;
Jaworska, JS ;
Walker, JD ;
Comber, MHI ;
Watts, CD ;
Worth, AP .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 111 (10) :1391-1401
[8]   Computer systems for the prediction of toxicity: an update [J].
Greene, N .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2002, 54 (03) :417-431
[9]   (Q)SARs: Gatekeepers against risk on chemicals? [J].
Hulzebos, EM ;
Posthumus, R .
SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (04) :285-316
[10]   Summary of a Workshop on Regulatory Acceptance of (Q)SARs for Human Health and Environmental Endpoints [J].
Jaworska, JS ;
Comber, M ;
Auer, C ;
Van Leeuwen, CJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 111 (10) :1358-1360