Marginal Zone Lymphomas Factors That Affect the Final Outcome

被引:33
|
作者
Mazloom, Ali [1 ]
Medeiros, L. Jeffrey [2 ]
McLaughlin, Peter W. [3 ]
Reed, Valerie [1 ]
Cabanillas, Fernando F. [3 ]
Fayad, Luis E. [1 ]
Pro, Barbara [3 ]
Gonzalez, Graciela [4 ]
Iyengar, Puneeth [1 ]
Urbauer, Diana L. [4 ]
Dabaja, Bouthaina S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hematopathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Lymphoma & Myeloma, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Quantitat Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
marginal zone lymphoma; mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; prognostic factors; extranodal; nodal; splenic; B-CELL LYMPHOMA; TISSUE LYMPHOMA; VILLOUS LYMPHOCYTES; MALIGNANT-LYMPHOMAS; MALT LYMPHOMA; DISEASE; CLASSIFICATION; DISSEMINATION; NEOPLASMS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.25325
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: A retrospective review and analysis of 275 patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) was performed to determine prognostic factors. An effort was also made to establish a specific prognostic score for patients with extranodal MZL. METHODS: Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of MZL: extranodal, nodal, and splenic. Factors analyzed included age; gender; presence of B symptoms; Zubrod performance score; clinical stage; serum beta(2)-microglobulin, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, and hemoglobin levels; and presence of autoimmune disorder. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with extranodal, nodal, and splenic MZL were 87%, 89%, and 93%, respectively (P = .95). On multivariate analysis, splenic MZL patients had the best prognosis (hazard ratio, 0.18; P = .018). An elevated serum beta(2)-microglobulin level (P = .010), B symptoms (P = .021), and male gender (P = .036) were found to be correlated with decreased recurrence-free survival (RFS) on multivariate analysis. Using these 3 variables, a 3-tier prognostic scoring system was created for patients with extranodal MZL: low-risk with no adverse factors, intermediate-risk with 1 adverse factor, and high-risk with >= 2 adverse factors. The 5-year RFS rates for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups were 80%, 71%, and 44%, respectively (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with extranodal and nodal MZL have a similar prognosis, whereas patients with splenic MZL have a better prognosis despite the increased prevalence of negative prognostic indicators. With the use of 3 readily available factors, a prognostic scoring system was identified for patients with extranodal MZL. Cancer 2010;116:4291-8. (C) 2010 American Cancer Society
引用
收藏
页码:4291 / 4298
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Factors That Affect the Final Outcome, a Study of 275 Patients.
    Mazloom, Ali
    Reed, Valerie K.
    Cabanillas, Fernando
    Fayad, Luis
    Pro, Barbara
    Iyengar, Puneeth
    McLaughlin, Peter
    Urbauer, Diana L.
    Dabaia, Bouthaina S.
    BLOOD, 2008, 112 (11) : 1289 - 1289
  • [2] Marginal zone lymphomas
    Zucca, E.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2012, 82 : S9 - S9
  • [3] Marginal Zone Lymphomas
    Thieblemont, Catherine
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 40 : 5 - 6
  • [4] Marginal zone lymphomas
    Coiffier, B
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1998, 9 : 3 - 3
  • [5] Marginal Zone Lymphomas
    Zucca, Emanuele
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2019, 19 : S97 - S99
  • [6] MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMAS
    Fabbri, N.
    Arcaini, L.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2021, 106 (10) : 231 - 231
  • [7] Lymphomas of the marginal zone
    不详
    HEMATOLOGIE, 2007, 13 (05): : 324 - 327
  • [8] Marginal zone lymphomas
    Zucca, Emanuele
    Rossi, Davide
    Bertoni, Francesco
    HEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 : 88 - 91
  • [9] Marginal Zone Lymphomas
    Zucca, Emanuele
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2018, 18 : S93 - S94
  • [10] Marginal Zone Lymphomas
    Bertoni, Francesco
    Rossi, Davide
    Raderer, Markus
    Zucca, Emanuele
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (04): : 336 - 347