Electroacupuncture Is Not Effective in Chronic Painful Neuropathies

被引:14
|
作者
Penza, Paola [1 ]
Bricchi, Monica [2 ]
Scola, Amalia [2 ]
Campanella, Angela [1 ]
Lauria, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Fdn Carlo Besta, Neuromuscular Dis Unit, Neurol Inst, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Fdn Carlo Besta, Anesthesiol Unit, Neurol Inst, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Acupuncture; Electroacupuncture; Neuropathic Pain; Painful Neuropathy; Peripheral Neuropathy; Treatment; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; ACUPUNCTURE TREATMENT; COLD ALLODYNIA; RAT MODEL; HZ; MECHANISMS; RECEPTORS; ANALGESIA; MEDIATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01230.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective. To investigate the analgesic efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) in patients with chronic painful neuropathy. Design. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy, neuropathic pain (visual analog scale > 4) for at least 6 months, and stable analgesic medications for at least 3 months. Patients. Sixteen patients were randomized into two arms to be treated with EA or pseudo-EA (placebo). Interventions. The protocol included 6 weeks of treatment, 12 weeks free of treatment, and then further 6 weeks of treatment. EA or pseudo-EA was performed weekly during each treatment period. Outcome Measures. The primary outcome was the number of patients treated with EA achieving at least 50% of pain relief at the end of each treatment compared with pain intensity at baseline. Secondary outcomes were modification in patient's global impression of change, depression and anxiety, and quality of life. Results. Eleven patients were randomized to EA and five patients to pseudo-EA as the first treatment. Only one patient per group (EA and pseudo-EA) reported 50% of pain relief at the end of each treatment compared with pain intensity at baseline. Pain intensity did not differ between EA (5.7 +/- 2.3 at baseline and 4.97 +/- 3.23 after treatment) and pseudo-EA (4.9 +/- 1.9 at baseline and 4.18 +/- 2.69 after treatment). There was no difference between patients who received EA as the first treatment and patients initially treated with placebo. There was no change in the secondary outcomes. Conclusions. Our results do not support the use of EA in this population of painful neuropathy patients. Further studies in larger groups of patients are warranted to confirm our observation.
引用
收藏
页码:1819 / 1823
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Painful neuropathies
    Sommer, C
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2003, 16 (05) : 623 - 628
  • [2] Painful neuropathies
    Koltzenburg, M
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 1998, 11 (05) : 515 - 521
  • [3] Cytokines in painful neuropathies
    Sommer, C
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH BIENNIAL CONGRESS OF THE ASIAN & OCEANIC SOCIETY OF REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2005, : 87 - 91
  • [4] Painful peripheral neuropathies
    Vaillancourt, PD
    Langevin, HM
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 83 (03) : 627 - +
  • [5] Painful peripheral neuropathies
    Marchettini, P.
    Lacerenza, M.
    Mauri, E.
    Marangoni, C.
    CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 4 (03) : 175 - 181
  • [6] Painful Peripheral Neuropathies
    Kraychete, Durval Campos
    Sakata, Rioko Kimiko
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2011, 61 (05): : 641 - 658
  • [7] Management of painful neuropathies
    Gould III H.J.
    Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 2007, 9 (2) : 75 - 84
  • [8] Sensory neuropathies including painful and toxic neuropathies
    Wokke, JHJ
    vanDijk, GW
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 244 (04) : 209 - 221
  • [9] Sensory neuropathies including painful and toxic neuropathies
    John H. J. Wokke
    Gert W. van Dijk
    Journal of Neurology, 1997, 244 : 209 - 221
  • [10] Neurophysiological assessment of painful neuropathies
    Barraza-Sandoval, Gonzalo
    Casanova-Molla, Jordi
    Valls-Sole, Josep
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2012, 12 (11) : 1297 - 1310