Establishing open science research priorities in health psychology: a research prioritisation Delphi exercise

被引:3
|
作者
Norris, Emma [1 ,2 ]
Prescott, Amy [3 ]
Noone, Chris [4 ]
Green, James A. [5 ,6 ]
Reynolds, James [7 ]
Grant, Sean Patrick [8 ,9 ]
Toomey, Elaine [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ London, Hlth Behav Change Res Grp, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[2] Brunel Univ London, Dept Hlth Sci, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[3] Brunel Univ London, Dept Life Sci, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[4] NUI Galway, Sch Psychol, Galway, Ireland
[5] Univ Limerick, Hlth Res Inst HRI, Limerick, Ireland
[6] Univ Limerick, Sch Allied Hlth, Limerick, Ireland
[7] Aston Univ, Sch Psychol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[8] Indiana & Purdue Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[9] Univ Oregon, Coll Educ, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
Open science; Delphi study; research prioritisation; health psychology; meta-research; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; TRANSPARENCY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/08870446.2022.2139830
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective Research on Open Science practices in Health Psychology is lacking. This meta-research study aimed to identify research question priorities and obtain consensus on the Top 5 prioritised research questions for Open Science in Health Psychology. Methods and measures An international Delphi consensus study was conducted. Twenty-three experts in Open Science and Health Psychology within the European Health Psychology Society (EHPS) suggested research question priorities to create a 'long-list' of items (Phase 1). Forty-three EHPS members rated the importance of these items, ranked their top five and suggested their own additional items (Phase 2). Twenty-four EHPS members received feedback on Phase 2 responses and then re-rated and re-ranked their top five research questions (Phase 3). Results The top five ranked research question priorities were: 1. 'To what extent are Open Science behaviours currently practised in Health Psychology?', 2. 'How can we maximise the usefulness of Open Data and Open Code resources?', 3. 'How can Open Data be increased within Health Psychology?', 4. 'What interventions are effective for increasing the adoption of Open Science in Health Psychology?' and 5. 'How can we increase free Open Access publishing in Health Psychology?'. Conclusion Funding and resources should prioritise the research questions identified here.
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1242
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Establishing the research priorities of a national primary care research network in New Zealand: a Delphi exercise
    Leitch, Sharon
    Li, Jing-Ru
    Stokes, Tim
    JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2024,
  • [2] Research priorities for primary care mental health: a Delphi exercise
    James, P
    Aitken, P
    Burns, T
    PRIMARY CARE PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 8 (01): : 27 - 30
  • [3] Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation
    Woods, Beth
    Schmitt, Laetitia
    Rothery, Claire
    Phillips, Andrew
    Hallett, Timothy B.
    Revill, Paul
    Claxton, Karl
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5 (08):
  • [4] Identifying integrated health services and social care research priorities in kidney disease in Wales: research prioritisation exercise
    Mc Laughlin, Leah
    Spence, Susan
    Noyes, Jane
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [5] Establishing the Research Priorities of ADHD Professionals: An International Delphi Study
    Stephens, Kate
    Sciberras, Emma
    Bisset, Matthew
    Summerton, Ainsley
    Coghill, David
    Middeldorp, Christel M.
    Payne, Leanne
    Bellgrove, Mark A.
    Faraone, Stephen V.
    Banaschewski, Tobias
    Newcorn, Jeffery H.
    Espinet, Stacey D.
    Manor, Iris
    Alqahtani, Mohammed M. J.
    Varnham, Jeremy
    Silk, Timothy J.
    JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2025, 29 (05) : 303 - 311
  • [6] Agreeing on global research priorities for medication safety: an international prioritisation exercise
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Rudan, Igor
    Cresswell, Kathrin
    Dhingra-Kumar, Neelam
    Tan, Mei Lee
    Hakkinen, Minna L.
    Donaldson, Liam
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 9 (01)
  • [7] Establishing local priorities for a health research agenda
    Whear, Rebecca
    Thompson-Coon, Jo
    Boddy, Kate
    Papworth, Helen
    Frier, Julie
    Stein, Ken
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (01) : 8 - 21
  • [8] Establishing Research Priorities in Geriatric Nephrology: A Delphi Study of Clinicians and Researchers
    Butler, Catherine R.
    Nalatwad, Akanksha
    Cheung, Katharine L.
    Hannan, Mary F.
    Hladek, Melissa D.
    Johnston, Emily A.
    Kimberly, Laura
    Liu, Christine K.
    Nair, Devika
    Ozdemir, Semra
    Saeed, Fahad
    Scherer, Jennifer S.
    Segev, Dorry L.
    Sheshadri, Anoop
    Tennankore, Karthik K.
    Washington, Tiffany R.
    Wolfgram, Dawn
    Ghildayal, Nidhi
    Hall, Rasheeda
    McAdams-DeMarco, Mara
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2025, 85 (03) : 293 - 302
  • [9] ESTABLISHING RESEARCH PRIORITIES
    不详
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1989, 61 (04): : 452 - 459
  • [10] ESTABLISHING RESEARCH PRIORITIES
    BENMEIR, M
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION IN IRRIGATION, 1989, 94 : 104 - 110