Effect of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with D'Amico Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study

被引:61
|
作者
Preisser, Felix [1 ,3 ]
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. [4 ]
Gandaglia, Giorgio [5 ]
Ost, Piet [6 ]
Surcel, Christian I. [7 ]
Sooriakumaran, Prasanna [8 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [5 ]
Graefen, Markus [1 ]
van der Poel, Henk [4 ]
de la Taille, Alexandre [9 ]
Briganti, Alberto [5 ]
Salomon, Laurent [9 ]
Ploussard, Guillaume [9 ,10 ,11 ]
Tilki, Derya [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Prostate Canc Ctr, Martini Klin, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Div Oncol, URI, Unit Urol, Milan, Italy
[6] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Ghent, Belgium
[7] Fundeni Clin Inst, Ctr Urol Surg Dialysis & Renal Transplantat, Bucharest, Romania
[8] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Urooncol, London, England
[9] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, Creteil, France
[10] La Croix Sud Hosp, Dept Urol, Toulouse, France
[11] Inst Univ Canc Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2020年 / 203卷 / 02期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; neoplasm metastasis; lymph node excision; mortality; IMPROVES SURVIVAL; LYMPHADENECTOMY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000504
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pelvic lymph node dissection represents the gold standard of lymph node staging in patients with prostate cancer. We sought to assess the effect of extended pelvic lymph node dissection on oncologic outcomes in patients with characteristics of D'Amico intermediate or high risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: In a multi-institutional database of 4 centers we identified 9,742 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2000 to 2017 with or without pelvic lymph node dissection. Only patients with a greater than 5% probability of lymph node invasion according to the Briganti nomogram were included in study. We performed 2:1 propensity score matching to account for potential differences between the 2 cohorts. Cox regression models were used to test the effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence, metastasis and cancer specific mortality. Results: Overall 707 patients (7.3%) did not undergo pelvic lymph node dissection, of whom 520 and 187 harbored D'Amico intermediate and high risk characteristics, respectively. A median of 14 lymph nodes (IQR 8-21) were removed in the pelvic lymph node dissection cohort and 1,714 of these cases (19.0%) harbored lymph node metastasis. After propensity score matching the biochemical recurrence-free, metastasis-free and cancer specific mortality-free survival rates were 60.4% vs 65.6% (p = 0.07), 87.0% vs 90.0% (p=0.06) and 95.2% vs 96.4% (p = 0.2) for pelvic lymph node dissection vs no pelvic lymph node dissection 120 months after radical prostatectomy. Multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for postoperative and preoperative tumor characteristics revealed that pelvic lymph node dissection performed at radical prostatectomy was no independent predictor of biochemical recurrence, metastasis or cancer specific mortality (all p >= 0.1). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in oncologic outcomes in patients with D'Amico high or intermediate risk prostate cancer in whom pelvic lymph node dissection was or was not performed at radical prostatectomy. The therapeutic value of pelvic lymph node dissection remains unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 343
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Effect of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with D'Amico Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study
    Hajiran, Ali
    Pow-Sang, Julio
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (01): : 159 - 159
  • [2] Re: Effects of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with D'Amico Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-institutional Study
    Skolarikos, Andreas
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (05) : 658 - 659
  • [3] EFFECT OF EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION ON ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES IN D'AMICO INTERMEDIATE- AND HIGH-RISK RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PATIENTS
    Preisser, Felix
    van den Bergh, Roderick
    Gandaglia, Gorgio
    Ost, Piet
    Sucrel, Christian
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Graefen, Markus
    van der Poel, Henk
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    Briganti, Alberto
    Salomon, Laurent
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Tilki, Derya
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E871 - E872
  • [4] ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF UNFAVORABLE INTERMEDIATE-RISK IS COMPARABLE TO HIGH-RISK LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION
    Ahallal, Youness
    Benarroche, Davy
    Zanettini, Luis Felipe Snel
    Colau, Alexandre
    Charbonnier, Clement
    Cote, Jean-Francois
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E819 - E819
  • [5] The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis
    Takuma Narita
    Takuya Koie
    Teppei Ookubo
    Koji Mitsuzuka
    Shintaro Narita
    Hayato Yamamoto
    Takamitsu Inoue
    Shingo Hatakeyama
    Sadafumi Kawamura
    Tatsuo Tochigi
    Tomonori Habuchi
    Yoichi Arai
    Chikara Ohyama
    Medical Oncology, 2017, 34
  • [6] The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis
    Narita, Takuma
    Koie, Takuya
    Ookubo, Teppei
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Narita, Shintaro
    Yamamoto, Hayato
    Inoue, Takamitsu
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    Tochigi, Tatsuo
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    Arai, Yoichi
    Ohyama, Chikara
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 34 (01)
  • [7] Comparison of oncological outcomes between extended and no pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with high- or very high-risk prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study
    Washino, Satoshi
    Kawase, Makoto
    Shimbo, Masaki
    Yamasaki, Takeshi
    Ohba, Kojiro
    Miki, Jun
    Miyagawa, Tomoaki
    Koie, Takuya
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 12 (03) : 160 - 166
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness comparison between neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis
    Teppei Matsumoto
    Shingo Hatakeyama
    Teppei Ookubo
    Koji Mitsuzuka
    Shintaro Narita
    Takamitsu Inoue
    Shinichi Yamashita
    Takuma Narita
    Takuya Koie
    Sadafumi Kawamura
    Tatsuo Tochigi
    Norihiko Tsuchiya
    Tomonori Habuchi
    Yoichi Arai
    Chikara Ohyama
    Medical Oncology, 2017, 34
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness comparison between neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis
    Matsumoto, Teppei
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Ookubo, Teppei
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Narita, Shintaro
    Inoue, Takamitsu
    Yamashita, Shinichi
    Narita, Takuma
    Koie, Takuya
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    Tochigi, Tatsuo
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    Arai, Yoichi
    Ohyama, Chikara
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 34 (12)
  • [10] The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional analysis.
    Koie, Takuya
    Ookubo, Teppei
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Narita, Shintaro
    Inoue, Takamitsu
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06)