Multiscale comparison of LS factor calculation methods based on different flow direction algorithms in Susa Ancient landscape

被引:6
|
作者
Khanifar, Javad [1 ]
Khademalrasoul, Ataallah [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Chamran Univ Ahvaz, Fac Agr, Soil Sci Dept, Ahwaz, Iran
关键词
LS factor; DEM; Flow accumulation; Flow routing algorithm; Topography; SOIL LOSS; DRAINAGE NETWORKS; CATCHMENT-AREA; PREDICTION; GIS; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1007/s11600-020-00432-1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Topography (LS factor) is one of the most important controlling factors of soil characteristics and geomorphic processes in the landscape. This study was performed in the Susa Ancient site and aimed to compare the estimation of three different LS factor calculation methods in which the catchment area was calculated based on seven types of flow direction algorithms using DEM with five spatial resolutions. For calculating the LS factor, the catchment area attribute was used to calculate the slope length based on the flow direction. Results showed that the catchment area is an entirely scale-dependent attribute and with decreasing the spatial resolution, the statistical values of catchment area increased. At high spatial resolution, the different flow direction algorithms despite the difference in the flow distribution to the neighboring cells, but the catchment area attributes calculated based on them, are statistically slightly different. By upscaling, the LS factor values calculated in Boehner and Selige and Moore et al. methods increase, whereas in Desmet and Govers method decrease and this change rate indicates that the LS factors calculated by these three methods have the lowest sensitivity to the slope length. At a same scale, the statistics of LS factors calculated based on different flow direction algorithms depicted no considerable different. The single flow direction algorithms of Rh and D8 cause to calculate the lowest mean values of LS factors at all spatial resolutions. The difference between frequency distributions of the LS factors calculated by these three methods increases with decreasing spatial resolution. The statistical analysis of this study confirms that estimating the LS factor scale and calculation method are more important than the type of flow direction algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 793
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Multiscale comparison of LS factor calculation methods based on different flow direction algorithms in Susa Ancient landscape
    Javad Khanifar
    Ataallah Khademalrasoul
    Acta Geophysica, 2020, 68 : 783 - 793
  • [2] Comparison of Different Methods for the Calculation of the Microvascular Flow Index
    Pozo, Mario O.
    Kanoore Edul, Vanina S.
    Ince, Can
    Dubin, Arnaldo
    CRITICAL CARE RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2012, 2012
  • [3] Comparison of two different methods for determining flow direction in catchment hydrological modeling
    Zhao, Guang-Ju
    Gao, Jun-Feng
    Tian, Peng
    Tian, Kun
    WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 2 (04) : 1 - 15
  • [5] Comparison of Different Numerical Methods for Quality Factor Calculation of Nano and Micro Photonic Cavities
    Taghizadeh, Alireza
    Moerk, Jesper
    Chung, Il-Sug
    2014 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ADVANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC MATERIALS IN MICROWAVES AND OPTICS (METAMATERIALS), 2014,
  • [6] Comparison of the Methods for LS Factor Calculation when Evaluating the Erosion Risk in a Small Agricultural Area Using the USLE Tool
    Karasek, Petr
    Pochop, Michal
    Konecna, Jana
    Podhrazska, Jana
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 23 (01): : 100 - 109
  • [7] Mapping soil organic matter using the topographic wetness index: A comparative study based on different flow-direction algorithms and kriging methods
    Pei, Tao
    Qin, Cheng-Zhi
    Zhu, A-Xing
    Yang, Lin
    Luo, Ming
    Li, Baolin
    Zhou, Chenghu
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2010, 10 (03) : 610 - 619
  • [8] Comparison of Different Approaches to LS Factor Calculations Based on a Measured Soil Loss under Simulated Rainfall
    Hrabalikova, Michaela
    Janecek, Miloslav
    SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 12 (02) : 69 - 77
  • [9] Implementation of different methods for PTDF matrix calculation in flow-based coordinated auction
    Vukasovic, Milan
    Skuletic, Sreten
    POWERENG2007: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER ENGINEERING - ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL DRIVES PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 & 2, 2007, : 791 - +
  • [10] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CALCULATION METHODS OF RAIN FACTOR FOR AREA OF SOUTH-WESTERN PART OF SLOVAK REPUBLIC
    Halaszova, Klaudia
    Maderkova, Lucia
    Antal, Jaroslav
    Cimo, Jan
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM-FORMATIO CIRCUMIECTUS, 2013, 12 (03) : 21 - 27