Generativity and the paradox of stability and flexibility in a platform architecture: A case of the Oracle Cloud Platform

被引:22
作者
Sun, Ruonan [1 ]
Gregor, Shirley [2 ]
Fielt, Erwin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Management Sch, Lancaster, England
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Platform; Generativity; Architecture; Paradox; Stability; Flexibility; Oracle Cloud; DIGITAL PLATFORMS; BOUNDARY RESOURCES; APPLICATION SOFTWARE; DESIGN THEORY; SYSTEMS; DEVELOPERS; ECOSYSTEMS; INNOVATION; INFRASTRUCTURES; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2021.103548
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Generativity is a technology's capability of producing new outputs without input from the originator. Platforms are important technologies that embrace generativity. While the literature generally assumes that generativity arises from platform governance and high-level platform design, we propose that generativity also arises from a platform's three architectural components: the base, the interface, and the add-ons. Drawing on a case study of the Oracle Cloud Platform, we reveal how generativity emerges through the paradox of stability and flexibility in a platform's architectural components. Further, standardization navigates this paradox by coordinating the dependencies between stability and flexibility across heterogeneous stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Architectures in context: on the evolution of business, application software, and ICT platform architectures [J].
Aerts, ATM ;
Goossenaerts, JBM ;
Hammer, DK ;
Wortmann, JC .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2004, 41 (06) :781-794
[2]   Self-Organizing in Blockchain Infrastructures: Generativity Through Shifting Objectives and Forking [J].
Andersen, Jonas Valbjorn ;
Bogusz, Claire Ingram .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 20 (09) :1242-1273
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
[4]   From generative fit to generative capacity: exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance [J].
Avital, Michel ;
Te'eni, Dov .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2009, 19 (04) :345-367
[5]  
Baldwin C.Y., 2009, ARCHITECTURE PLATFOR, DOI [10.4337/9781849803311.00008, DOI 10.4337/9781849803311.00008]
[6]   Achieving dynamic capabilities with cloud computing: an empirical investigation [J].
Battleson, Douglas A. ;
West, Barry C. ;
Kim, Jongwoo ;
Ramesh, Balasubramaniam ;
Robinson, Pamela S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 25 (03) :209-230
[7]   How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors' perspective [J].
Benlian, Alexander ;
Hilkert, Daniel ;
Hess, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 30 (03) :209-228
[8]  
Bossert O., 2019, MCKINSEY DIGIT, V8
[9]   Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control [J].
Boudreau, Kevin .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 56 (10) :1849-1872
[10]   OPTIMIZING AND SATISFICING: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN PLATFORM ARCHITECTURE AND PRODUCERS' DESIGN STRATEGIES FOR PLATFORM PERFORMANCE [J].
Brunswicker, Sabine ;
Almirall, Esteve ;
Majchrzak, Ann .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2019, 43 (04) :1249-+