Image Quality and Radiation Exposure With a Low Tube Voltage Protocol for Coronary CT Angiography Results of the PROTECTION II Trial

被引:193
作者
Hausleiter, Jorg
Martinoff, Stefan [1 ]
Hadamitzky, Martin
Martuscelli, Eugenio [2 ]
Pschierer, Iris [3 ]
Feuchtner, Gudrun M. [4 ]
Catalan-Sanz, Paz [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Czermak, Benedikt [8 ]
Meyer, Tanja S.
Hein, Franziska
Bischoff, Bernhard
Kuse, Miriam
Schomig, Albert
Achenbach, Stephan [9 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Radiol & Nukl Med, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen Klin, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Cardiol, Rome, Italy
[3] Krankenhaus Landshut Achdorf, Med Klin 1, Landshut, Germany
[4] Med Univ Innsbruck, Univ Klin Radiol 2, Innsbruck, Austria
[5] Ctr Med Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
[6] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Clin Creu Blanca, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Med Univ Innsbruck, Univ Klin Radiol 1, Innsbruck, Austria
[9] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Med Klin 2, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
angiography; computed tomography; imaging; multislice; radiation dose; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CARDIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY; COMMITTEE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.08.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate image quality and radiation dose using a 100 kVp tube voltage scan protocol compared with standard 120 kVp for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) BACKGROUND Concerns have been raised about radiation exposure during coronary CTA The use of a 100 kVp tube voltage scan protocol effectively lowers coronary CTA radiation dose compared with standard 120 kVp, but it is unknown whether image quality is maintained METHODS We enrolled 400 nonobese patients who underwent coronary CTA 202 patients were randomly assigned to a 100 kVp protocol and 198 patients to a 120 kVp protocol The primary end point was to demonstrate noninferiority in image quality with the 100 kVp protocol which was assessed by a 4-point grading score (1 = nondiagnostic, 4 = excellent image quality) For the noninferiority analysis a margin of -02 image quality score points for the difference between both scan protocols was pre-defined Secondary end points included radiation dose and need for additional diagnostic tests during follow up RESULTS The mean image quality scores in patients scanned with 100 kVp and 120 kVp were 3 30 +/- 067 and 3 28 +/- 068, respectively (p = 0742), image quality of the 100 kVp protocol was not inferior as demonstrated by the 97 5% confidence interval of the difference, which did not cross the pre-defined noninferiority margin of -02 The 100 kVp protocol was associated with a 31% relative reduction in radiation exposure (dose-length product 868 +/- 317 mGy x cm with 120 kVp vs 599 +/- 255 mGy x cm with 100 kVp, p < 0 0001) At 30-day follow-up, the need for additional diagnostic studies did not differ (13 4% vs 19 2% for 100 kVp vs 120 kVp, respectively, p = 0 114) CONCLUSIONS A coronary CTA protocol using 100 kVp tube voltage maintained image quality, but reduced radiation exposure by 31% as compared with the standard 120 kVp protocol Thus, 100 kVp scan protocols should be considered for nonobese patients to keep radiation exposure as low as reasonably achievable (Prospective Randomized Trial on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography in Patients Scanned With a 100 kVp Protocol [PROTECTION II], NCT00611780) (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2010,3 1113-23) (C) 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1123
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Abdulla, Jawdat ;
Abildstrom, Steen Z. ;
Gotzsche, Ole ;
Christensen, Erik ;
Kober, Lars ;
Torp-Pedersen, Christian .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (24) :3042-3050
[2]   Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: The effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters [J].
Alkadhi, Hatem ;
Stolzmann, Paul ;
Scheffel, Hans ;
Desbiolles, Lotus ;
Baumueller, Stephan ;
Plass, Andre ;
Genoni, Michele ;
Marincek, Borut ;
Leschka, Sebastian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 68 (03) :385-391
[3]  
American Association of Medical Physicists (AAPM), CT DOS MEAS REP MAN
[4]   Impact of a Reduced Tube Voltage on CT Angiography and Radiation Dose Results of the PROTECTION I Study [J].
Bischoff, Bernhard ;
Hein, Franziska ;
Meyer, Tanja ;
Hadamitzky, Martin ;
Martinoff, Stefan ;
Schoemig, Albert ;
Hausleiter, Joerg .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2009, 2 (08) :940-946
[5]  
BONGARTZ G, 16262 EUR EN EUR COM
[6]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[7]   QUANTITATIVE THEORY OF HOUNSFIELD UNIT AND ITS APPLICATION TO DUAL ENERGY SCANNING [J].
BROOKS, RA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1977, 1 (04) :487-493
[8]   Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: Improved image quality and reduced radiation dose [J].
Earls, James P. ;
Berman, Elise L. ;
Urban, Bruce A. ;
Curry, Charlene A. ;
Lane, Judith L. ;
Jennings, Robert S. ;
McCulloch, Colin C. ;
Hsieh, Jiang ;
Londt, John H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 246 (03) :742-753
[9]   Ionizing Radiation in Cardiac Imaging A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention [J].
Gerber, Thomas C. ;
Carr, J. Jeffrey ;
Arai, Andrew E. ;
Dixon, Robert L. ;
Ferrari, Victor A. ;
Gomes, Antoinette S. ;
Heller, Gary V. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. ;
McNitt-Gray, Michael F. ;
Mettler, Fred A. ;
Mieres, Jennifer H. ;
Morin, Richard L. ;
Yester, Michael V. .
CIRCULATION, 2009, 119 (07) :1056-1065
[10]  
Gutstein Ariel, 2008, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, V2, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.jcct.2008.07.003