Total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture. Are current guidelines appropriate for all patients? Five-year retrospective analysis of 315 cases

被引:2
|
作者
Studnicka, Katarzyna Jadwiga [1 ,3 ]
Kumar, Gunasekaran [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool & Broadgreen Univ Hosp Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Liverpool Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Mersey Deanery, ST7 Trauma & Orthopaed, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
Fragility fractures; Neck of femur fracture; Total hip replacement; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; ARTHROPLASTY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.041
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: According to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD), in 2018 31.4% of patients with dis-placed intracapsular neck of femur (NOF) fracture who, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) viewed eligible for total hip replacement (THR), received this operation. We aimed to identify the compliance of performing THR for those patients in our unit and identify the reasons for proceeding with the alternative type of surgery. Methods: A five-year retrospective review of eligible patients was conducted between January 2014 and Dec 2018. Statistical analysis was performed between groups who did or didn't receive THR. Reasons for not performing THR were identified from pre-operative ward rounds notes. Results: In 2018 our unit performed THR for 44% of eligible cases. This was the highest result over five-years and higher than the national average. Out of the 348 eligible cases, pathological or undisplaced intracapsular fractures were excluded. Reminder received THR (138), hip hemiarthroplasty (166) or internal fixation (11). The average age was 77. Younger patients were more likely to receive THR than 80 years or older (p < 0.05). THR group scored 0.4 points higher on AMTS and 0.2 lower on ASA scale then non-THR group (9.8 vs. 9.4 and 2.7 vs. 2.5 respectively). Mean time to surgery was 1.24 days with no significant differ-ence between THR and non-THR group (1.6 vs. 1.1) but a slight delay to surgery during the weekends was noted (1.3 vs 1.8 days). Reasons for not performing THR were well documented as a combination of mobility restrictions and serious medical comorbidities. Retrospectively we judged the surgical decision making to be correct in 95% of cases. Conclusions: Annual NHFD report comments on poor national and individual hospital's compliance with NICE guidelines without allowing surgeons to justify their choice of the procedure undertaken. Surgical decisions are made in a highly specialised multi-disciplinary environment taking into consider-ation individual patient's frailty and potential morbidity. Details of those discussions should be collected in NHFD to allow further analysis of reasons why surgeons decide not to offer THR to a patient NHFD views as eligible for this procedure. This could help in understanding the complex factors impacting on decision making in those cases. Level of evidence: Level III Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3011 / 3016
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Provision of total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture: a regional audit
    Lee, L. H.
    Sigamoney, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 33 - 34
  • [2] Displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures in mobile independent patients: total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty?
    Squires, B
    Bannister, G
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1999, 30 (05): : 345 - 348
  • [3] A comparison of hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED MULTICENTRE TRIAL IN PATIENTS AGED 70 YEARS AND OVER
    van den Bekerom, M. P. J.
    Hilverdink, E. F.
    Sierevelt, I. N.
    Reuling, E. M. B. P.
    Schnater, J. M.
    Bonke, H.
    Goslings, J. C.
    van Dijk, C. N.
    Raaymakers, E. L. F. B.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (10): : 1422 - 1428
  • [4] Total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck A SEVEN- TO TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP REPORT OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Avery, P. P.
    Baker, R. P.
    Walton, M. J.
    Rooker, J. C.
    Squires, B.
    Gargan, M. F.
    Bannister, G. C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (08): : 1045 - 1048
  • [5] Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cup in the treatment of old active patients with displaced neck of femur fracture: A retrospective cohort study
    Fahad, Shah
    Khan, Muhammed Zohaib Nawaz
    Aqueel, Talal
    Hashmi, Pervaiz
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2019, 45 : 62 - 65
  • [6] A comparison of hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a randomised controlled multicentre trial in patients aged 70 years and over (vol 92, pg 1422, 2010)
    van den Bekerom, M. P.
    Hilverdink, E. F.
    Sierevelt, I. N.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (01): : 140 - 140
  • [7] Displaced femoral neck fracture:: comparison of primary total hip replacement with secondary replacement after failed internal fixation -: A 2-year follow-up of 84 patients
    Blomfeldt, Richard
    Tornkvist, Hans
    Ponzer, Sari
    Soderqvist, Anita
    Tidermark, Jan
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2006, 77 (04) : 638 - 643
  • [8] Lower rates of dislocation with increased femoral head size after primary total hip replacement A FIVE-YEAR ANALYSIS OF NHS PATIENTS IN ENGLAND
    Jameson, S. S.
    Lees, D.
    James, P.
    Serrano-Pedraza, I.
    Partington, P. F.
    Muller, S. D.
    Meek, R. M. D.
    Reed, M. R.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (07): : 876 - 880