Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR

被引:1
|
作者
Auberson, Chloe [1 ]
Badertscher, Patrick [1 ]
Madaffari, Antonio [1 ]
Malushi, Meriton [1 ]
Bourquin, Luc [1 ]
Spies, Florian [1 ]
Aeschbacher, Stefanie [1 ]
Fahrni, Gregor [1 ]
Kaiser, Christoph [1 ]
Jeger, Raban [1 ]
Osswald, Stefan [1 ]
Sticherling, Christian [1 ]
Knecht, Sven [1 ]
Kuehne, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Div Cardiol, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
LBBB; TAVI; TAVR; Conduction delay; Electrocardiogram; ECG; AORTIC-VALVE-REPLACEMENT; ATRIOVENTRICULAR-BLOCK; TRANSCATHETER; DISTURBANCES; IMPLANTATION; RISK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-021-01924-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most common conduction disorder after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with an increased risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. The aim of the current study was to identify non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with LBBB. Methods We analyzed consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with pre-existing or new-onset LBBB between August 2014 and August 2020. His ventricular (HV) interval measurement was performed on day 1 after TAVR. Baseline, procedural, as well as surface and intracardiac electrocardiographic parameters were included. Infranodal conduction delay was defined as HV interval > 55 ms. Results Of 825 patients screened after TAVR, 151 patients (82 +/- 6 years, 39% male) with LBBB were included. Among these, infranodal conduction delay was observed in 25%. Delta PR (difference in PR interval after and before TAVR), PR and QRS duration after TAVR were significantly longer in the group with HV prolongation. In a multivariate analysis in patients with sinus rhythm (n = 123), Delta PR (OR per 10 ms increase: 1.52; 95%CI: 1.19-2.01; p = 0.002) was the only independent factor associated with infranodal conduction delay. A change in PR interval by 20 ms yielded a specificity of 83% and a sensitivity of 46%, with a negative predictive value of 84% and a positive predictive value of 45% to predict HV prolongation. Conclusions Simple analysis of surface ECG and a calculated Delta PR < 20 ms can be used as predictor for the absence of infranodal conduction delay in post-TAVR patients with LBBB.
引用
收藏
页码:1967 / 1976
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-invasive predictors for infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after TAVR
    Chloé Auberson
    Patrick Badertscher
    Antonio Madaffari
    Meriton Malushi
    Luc Bourquin
    Florian Spies
    Stefanie Aeschbacher
    Gregor Fahrni
    Christoph Kaiser
    Raban Jeger
    Stefan Osswald
    Christian Sticherling
    Sven Knecht
    Michael Kühne
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2021, 110 : 1967 - 1976
  • [2] SERIAL STUDIES OF INFRANODAL CONDUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK
    PETERS, R
    MCANULTY, J
    SCHEINMAN, M
    MURPHY, E
    SOMELOFSKI, C
    RAHIMTOOLA, S
    CIRCULATION, 1978, 58 (04) : 155 - 155
  • [3] Novel Predictors New Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block After Evolut TAVR
    Zaid, Syed
    Sengupta, Aditya
    Okoli, Kimberly
    Tsoi, Melissa
    Khan, Asaad
    Ahmad, Hasan
    Goldberg, Joshua
    Undemir, Cenap
    Patel, Nish
    Khan, Muhammad
    Gupta, Eisha
    Kovacic, Jason
    Lansman, Steven
    Dangas, George
    Sharma, Samin
    Kini, Annapoorna
    Tang, Gilbert
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (13) : B522 - B522
  • [4] Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block
    Mordi, Ify
    Tzemos, Nikolaos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 184 : 47 - 55
  • [5] Left Bundle Branch Block After TAVR Bubble or Trouble?
    Waksman, Ron
    Khan, Jaffar M.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (12) : 1185 - 1187
  • [6] Incidence of infranodal conduction delay in patients with left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Impact of the 2021 ESC guidelines for cardiac pacing
    Badertscher, Patrick
    Maeder, Nina
    Serban, Teodor
    Nestelberger, Thomas
    Leibundgut, Gregor
    Kaiser, Christoph
    Osswald, Stefan
    Sticherling, Christian
    Knecht, Sven
    Kuehne, Michael
    HEART RHYTHM, 2023, 20 (04) : 646 - 647
  • [7] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF INFRANODAL CONDUCTION TIME IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK
    SCHEINMAN, MM
    PETERS, RW
    MODIN, G
    BRENNAN, M
    MIES, C
    OYOUNG, J
    CIRCULATION, 1977, 56 (02) : 240 - 244
  • [8] Detection of Incomplete Left Bundle Branch Block by Non-invasive Electrocardiographic Imaging
    Bear, Laura
    Huntjens, Peter
    Coronel, Ruben
    Bernus, Olivier
    Dallet, Corentin
    Walton, Richard
    Dubois, Remi
    2016 COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY CONFERENCE (CINC), VOL 43, 2016, 43 : 389 - 392
  • [9] RECONSTITUTION OF NATIVE INTRINSIC CONDUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERAL YEARS OF COMPLETE INFRANODAL HEART BLOCK AND LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK WITH PERMANENT HIS BUNDLE PACING
    Ezzeddine, Fatima
    Simon, Joel
    Singh, Rajeev
    Dandamudi, Gopi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 448 - 448
  • [10] Novel Predictors of New Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block after Edwards Sapien 3 TAVR
    Zaid, Syed
    Ahmad, Hasan
    Khan, Asaad
    Kaple, Ryan
    Undemir, Cenap
    Kovacic, Jason
    Lansman, Steven
    Dangas, George
    Sharma, Samin
    Kini, Annapoorna
    Tang, Gilbert
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (13) : B532 - B532