A Comparison Study on the Alignment of Prosodic and Semantic Units and Its Effects on F0 Shifting in L1 and L2 English Spontaneous Speech

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yuqing [1 ]
Li, Zhu [1 ]
Zhang, Jinsong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] BLCU, Sch Informat Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] BLCU, Res Inst Int Chinese Language Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] BLCU, Adv Innovat Ctr Language Resource & Intelligence, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
L2 spontaneous speech; prosodic unit; semantic unit in discourse; f0; shifting; DECLINATION;
D O I
10.1109/ISCSLP49672.2021.9362076
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Linguistic work on speech planning has established that advanced planning involves both the complexity of the subsequent utterance (i.e., utterance length) and the semantic completeness of the upcoming speech (e.g., whether the whole utterance reaches the termination of semantic units). Yet relatively little attention has been paid to the preplanning capacity of second-language (L2) learners. This study investigates whether learners are capable of pitch-related preplanning based on semantic units in discourse (DUs) in L2 spontaneous speech production. We analyzed relationships between f0 metrics and the semantic completeness of prosodic units (PUs) in English spontaneous speech by native speakers and EFL learners of Mandarin and Cantonese. The results indicate that PU-DU left alignment introduces an initial f0 up-shifting, and PU-DU right alignment produces a final f0 down-shifting in both L1 and L2 speech, suggesting speakers' sensitivity to the initiation and termination of DUs. Critically, only in L1 speech the initial f0 height correlates with PU-DU right alignment, the final f0 is connected to the left alignment, and the f0 slope is strongly related to PU-DU left and right alignment conditions. The absence of correlation in L2 speech might reflect learners' limited capacity of preplanning a whole DU in spontaneous speech production.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Musical expertise and perception of f0 variations in L1/L2
    Schwab, Sandra
    Calpini, Noemie
    REVUE FRANCAISE DE LINGUISTIQUE APPLIQUEE, 2018, 23 (01): : 15 - 30
  • [2] F0 Patterns of L2 English Speech by Mandarin Chinese Learners
    Ding, Hongwei
    Lin, Binghuai
    Wang, Liyuan
    INTERSPEECH 2021, 2021, : 3934 - 3938
  • [3] The effect of F0 peak-delay on the L1/L2 perception of English lexical stress
    Tokuma, Shinichi
    Xu, Yi
    INTERSPEECH 2009: 10TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2009, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 1619 - +
  • [4] A Comparative Study of Native (L1) and Nonnative (L2) English Speech Strategy for Discourse Prosodic Organization
    Saha, Shambhu Nath
    Das Mandal, Shyamal Kr.
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION (IHCI 2012), 2012,
  • [5] Prosodic processing in sentences with 'only' in L1 and L2 English
    Ganga, Rachida
    Ge, Haoyan
    Struiksma, Marijn E.
    Yip, Virginia
    Chen, Aoju
    STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2024, 46 (02) : 478 - 503
  • [6] Continuous speech segmentation by L1 and L2 speakers of English: the role of syntactic and prosodic cues
    Dobrego, Aleksandra
    Konina, Alena
    Mauranen, Anna
    LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2023, 32 (03) : 487 - 507
  • [7] Perception of Prosodic Prominence and Boundaries by L1 and L2 Speakers of English
    Pinter, Gabor
    Mizuguchi, Shinobu
    Tateishi, Koichi
    15TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2014), VOLS 1-4, 2014, : 544 - 547
  • [8] Effects of English L2 on Norwegian L1
    Sunde, Anne Mette
    Kristoffersen, Martin
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS, 2018, 41 (03) : 275 - 307
  • [9] Prosodic transfer: L1 effects on the production of L2 determiners
    Goad, Heather
    White, Lydia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 30TH ANNUAL BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 213 - 224
  • [10] Impact of Japanese L1 Rhythm on English L2 Speech
    Kawase, Saya
    Davis, Chris
    Kim, Jeesun
    LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2025, 68 (01) : 118 - 140