Estimating Country-Specific Incidence Rates of Rare Cancers: Comparative Performance Analysis of Modeling Approaches Using European Cancer Registry Data

被引:3
|
作者
Salmeron, Diego [1 ,2 ]
Botta, Laura [3 ]
Martinez, Jose Miguel [4 ,5 ]
Trama, Annalisa [3 ]
Gatta, Gemma [3 ]
Borras, Josep M. [6 ,7 ]
Capocaccia, Riccardo [3 ]
Cleries, Ramon [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Inst Murciano Invest Biosanitaria Virgen Arri, Hlth & Social Sci Dept, Murcia, Spain
[2] Ctr Invest Biomed Red Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBE, Murcia, Spain
[3] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Evaluat Epidemiol Unit, Milan, Italy
[4] Tech Univ Catalonia, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Alicante, Publ Hlth Res Grp, Alicante, Spain
[6] Catalan Inst Oncol, Canc Plan, Inst Invest Biomed Bellvitge IDIBELL, Ave Gran Via 199-203, Lhospitalet De Llobregat 08908, Spain
[7] Univ Barcelona, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Sci, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
credible interval; Poisson regression; random effects; rare events; uniform prior; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; PRIOR DISTRIBUTIONS; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; DISEASE; WINBUGS; BURDEN; INLA; MCMC;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwab262
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Estimating incidence of rare cancers is challenging for exceptionally rare entities and in small populations. In a previous study, investigators in the Information Network on Rare Cancers (RARECARENet) provided Bayesian estimates of expected numbers of rare cancers and 95% credible intervals for 27 European countries, using data collected by population-based cancer registries. In that study, slightly different results were found by implementing a Poisson model in integrated nested Laplace approximation/WinBUGS platforms. In this study, we assessed the performance of a Poisson modeling approach for estimating rare cancer incidence rates, oscillating around an overall European average and using small-count data in different scenarios/computational platforms. First, we compared the performance of frequentist, empirical Bayes, and Bayesian approaches for providing 95% confidence/credible intervals for the expected rates in each country. Second, we carried out an empirical study using 190 rare cancers to assess different lower/upper bounds of a uniform prior distribution for the standard deviation of the random effects. For obtaining a reliable measure of variability for country-specific incidence rates, our results suggest the suitability of using 1 as the lower bound for that prior distribution and selecting the random-effects model through an averaged indicator derived from 2 Bayesian model selection criteria: the deviance information criterion and the Watanabe-Akaike information criterion.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 498
页数:12
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据