Second opinions in markets for expert services: Experimental evidence

被引:29
|
作者
Mimra, Wanda [1 ]
Rasch, Alexander [2 ]
Waibel, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, CER ETH, Zuerichbergstr 18, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf Inst Competit Econ, Univ Str 1, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Overtreatment; Second opinion; Physician experts; Credence goods; Search costs; ANTIBIOTIC ABUSE; COMPETITION; INFORMATION; RECIPROCITY; PROVISION; DECEPTION; ECONOMICS; BEHAVIOR; GAME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2016.03.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We experimentally investigate the role of second opinions in markets where experts such as physicians both diagnose and provide the services. Physicians may exploit their informational advantage and overtreat their patients by providing a more costly and expensive treatment than necessary. We show that introducing costly second opinions significantly reduces the level of overtreatment. Lowering search costs leads to significantly more second opinions, but the overtreatment level does not decrease. Under low but not under high search costs, market efficiency rises with the introduction of second opinions, as the reduction in treatment costs due to less overtreatment exceeds the increase in incurred search costs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 125
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Second Opinions and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Expert Markets
    Baumann, Florian
    Rasch, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2024, 180 (01): : 74 - 105
  • [2] Can a bonus overcome moral hazard? Experimental evidence from markets for expert services
    Angelova, Vera
    Regner, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2018, 154 : 362 - 378
  • [3] HEARSAY EVIDENCE IN EXPERT OPINIONS
    DICK, RM
    JOURNAL OF POLICE SCIENCE AND ADMINISTRATION, 1980, 8 (04): : 378 - 384
  • [4] Consumer information in a market for expert services: Experimental evidence
    Schneider, Tim
    Meub, Lukas
    Bizer, Kilian
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 94
  • [5] Expert evidence. General prerequisites and procedural characteristics for expert opinions
    Ulsenheimer, K
    ANAESTHESIST, 2005, 54 (11): : 1081 - 1088
  • [6] Second opinions and price competition: Inefficiency in the market for expert advice
    Pesendorfer, W
    Wolinsky, A
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2003, 70 (02): : 417 - 437
  • [8] EXPERT OPINIONS
    ONEILL, C
    ABA JOURNAL, 1987, 73 : 14 - 14
  • [9] Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators
    Rees, Colin J.
    Bevan, Roisin
    Zimmermann-Fraedrich, Katharina
    Rutter, Matthew D.
    Rex, Douglas
    Dekker, Evelien
    Ponchon, Thierry
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Regula, Jaroslaw
    Saunders, Brian
    Hassan, Cesare
    Bourke, Michael J.
    Roesch, Thomas
    GUT, 2016, 65 (12) : 2045 - U171
  • [10] Multi-expert opinions combination based on evidence theory
    Chun-Mei, Lin
    Yue, He
    NEW ADVANCES IN SIMULATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMIZATION (SMO '07), 2007, : 393 - +