Attitude Determination for GRACE-FO: Reprocessing the Level-1A SC and IMU Data

被引:5
|
作者
Yang, Fan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Liang, Lei [6 ]
Wang, Changqing [6 ]
Luo, Zhicai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, MOE, Key Lab Fundamental Phys Quant Measurement, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Hubei Key Lab Gravitat & Quantum Phys, PGMF, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Phys, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Geophys, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, PGMF, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Innovat Acad Precis Measurement Sci & Technol, Wuhan 430071, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
GRACE-FO; attitude determination; temporal gravity field; Kalman filter; SC; IMU; GRAVITY-FIELD; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/rs14010126
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The satellite gravity mission GRACE(-FO) has not yet reached its designed baseline accuracy. Previous studies demonstrated that the deficiency in the sensor system or the related signal processing might be responsible, which in turn motivates us to keep revising the sensor data processing, typically the spacecraft's attitude. Many efforts in the past have been made to enhance the attitude modeling for GRACE, for instance, the latest release reprocesses the attitude by fusing the angular acceleration with the star camera/tracker (SC) measurements, which helps to reduce the error in Level-2 temporal gravity fields. Therefore, in addition to GRACE, revising GRACE-FO attitude determination might make sense as well. This study starts with the most original raw GRACE-FO Level-1A data including those from three SCs and one IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit) sensors, and manage to generate a new publicly available Level-1B attitude product called HUGG-01 covering from June 2018 to December 2020, using our independently-developed software. The detailed treatment of individual payload is present in this study, and an indirect Kalman filter method is introduced to fuse the multiple sensors to acquire a relatively stable and precise attitude estimation. Unlike the direct SC combination method with a predefined weight as recommended in previous work, we propose an involvement of each SC measurement in the Kalman filter to enable a dynamic weight adjustment. Intensive experiments are further carried out to assess the HUGG-01, which demonstrate that the error level of HUGG-01 is entirely within the design requirement, i.e., the resulting KBR pointing variations are well controlled within 1 mrad (pitch), 5 mrad (roll) and 1 mrad (yaw). Moreover, comparisons with the official JPL-V04 attitude product demonstrate an equivalent performance in the low-to-middle spectrum, with even a slightly lower noise level (in the high spectrum) than JPL-V04. Further analysis on KBR range-rate residuals and gravity recovery on January 2019 indicates that, i.e., RMS of the difference (HUGG-01 minus JPL-V04) for the range rate is less than 3.234x10(-8) m/s, and the amplitude of geoid height difference is approximately 0.5 cm. Both differences are below the sensitivity of the state-of-the-art satellite gravity mission, demonstrating a good agreement between HUGG-01 and JPL-V04.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Results from GRACE-FO attitude determination based on Kalman filter
    Liang Lei
    Yan YiHao
    Wang ChangQing
    Zhu ZiTong
    Gao Ming
    Zhong Min
    Yu JinHai
    Xu Huan
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2022, 65 (12): : 4602 - 4615
  • [2] Results from a GRACE/GRACE-FO attitude reconstruction Kalman filter
    Harvey, Nate
    Sakumura, Carly
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2019, 93 (10) : 1881 - 1896
  • [3] On GPS data quality of GRACE-FO and GRACE satellites: effects of phase center variation and satellite attitude on precise orbit determination
    Yaowei Xia
    Xin Liu
    Jinyun Guo
    Zhouming Yang
    Linhu Qi
    Bing Ji
    Xiaotao Chang
    Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 2021, 56 : 93 - 111
  • [4] Results from a GRACE/GRACE-FO attitude reconstruction Kalman filter
    Nate Harvey
    Carly Sakumura
    Journal of Geodesy, 2019, 93 : 1881 - 1896
  • [5] On GPS data quality of GRACE-FO and GRACE satellites: effects of phase center variation and satellite attitude on precise orbit determination
    Xia, Yaowei
    Liu, Xin
    Guo, Jinyun
    Yang, Zhouming
    Qi, Linhu
    Ji, Bing
    Chang, Xiaotao
    ACTA GEODAETICA ET GEOPHYSICA, 2021, 56 (01) : 93 - 111
  • [6] Consistency analysis of GRACE and GRACE-FO data in the study of global mean sea level change
    Chang, Le
    Sun, Wenke
    GEODESY AND GEODYNAMICS, 2022, 13 (04) : 321 - 326
  • [7] Consistency analysis of GRACE and GRACE-FO data in the study of global mean sea level change
    Le Chang
    Wenke Sun
    GeodesyandGeodynamics, 2022, 13 (04) : 321 - 326
  • [8] GRACE-FO precise orbit determination and gravity recovery
    Z. Kang
    S. Bettadpur
    P. Nagel
    H. Save
    S. Poole
    N. Pie
    Journal of Geodesy, 2020, 94
  • [9] GRACE-FO precise orbit determination and gravity recovery
    Kang, Z.
    Bettadpur, S.
    Nagel, P.
    Save, H.
    Poole, S.
    Pie, N.
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2020, 94 (09)
  • [10] GRACE-FO attitude determination: Star camera installation matrix calibration and incremental quaternion integrator
    Wang, Aoming
    Gu, Defeng
    Huang, Zhiyong
    Liu, Chaoqun
    Shao, Kai
    Tong, Lisheng
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2024, 219 : 774 - 784