Sustainable Design Operations in the Supply Chain: Non-Profit Manufacturer vs. For-Profit Manufacturer

被引:21
|
作者
Li, Qingying [1 ]
Shen, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Donghua Univ, Glorious Sun Sch Business & Management, Shanghai 200051, Peoples R China
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2016年 / 8卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
sustainable design; supply chain; profit maximization; demand quantity maximization; Lagrangian method; DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.3390/su8070639
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable design aims to reduce the negative impacts either on people (e.g., create healthy) or on planet (e.g., minimize waste). In other words, sustainable design is the philosophy that tends to improve design performance by incorporating health and safety attributes (for people), and environmental attributes (for planet) into products. In this paper, we develop an analytical model to examine the sustainable design operations in a supply chain which consists of one retailer and one manufacturer. The manufacturer designs the products by investigating sustainable design efforts, such that the products can better coordinate human needs. Motivated by the real industry practice, we consider two business modes for the manufacturer: a nonprofit organization (i.e., a demand quantity seeker) or a commercial firm (i.e., a profit seeker). We obtain the optimal operational decisions in both the decentralized case and the centralized case, and we also compare the results. Managerial insights are derived, and the efficiency of the sustainable design is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CAREER COMMITMENT VS. ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: A COMPARISON BETWEEN FOR-PROFIT AND NON-PROFIT SECTORS
    Riveros, Andrea M. Moscoso
    Tsai, Ted Shir-Tau
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT (ICM 2011), 2011, : 1090 - 1107
  • [2] Mortality and transplantation rates, and practice patterns at for-profit vs non-profit and at chain vs non-chain facilities.
    Wolfe, RA
    Ashby, V
    Hulbert-Shearon, T
    Roys, E
    Saran, R
    Port, F
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 : 612A - 612A
  • [3] Study on profit distribution In upstream supply chain with manufacturer dominating
    Lv Qin
    Huo Jiazhen
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 6447 - 6450
  • [4] Pricing and profit distribution strategy for manufacturer and retailer in a supply chain
    Zhong, LG
    Lin, L
    Ma, QH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, 2005, : 183 - 187
  • [5] Competition Between For-Profit and Non-Profit Universities
    Purkayastha, Dipankar
    ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 52 (01) : 45 - 47
  • [6] Competition Between For-Profit and Non-Profit Universities
    Dipankar Purkayastha
    Atlantic Economic Journal, 2024, 52 : 45 - 47
  • [7] CONDITIONS AND NATURE OF COOPETITION OF FOR-PROFIT AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
    Stankiewicz, Janina
    Moczulska, Marta
    Seiler, Bartosz
    BUSINESS AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FACING INCREASED COMPETITION AND GROWING CUSTOMERS' DEMANDS, VOL 17, 2018, 17 : 111 - 126
  • [8] Coopetition in for-profit and non-profit organizations - micro level
    Moczulska, Marta
    Seiler, Bartosz
    Stankiewicz, Janina
    MANAGEMENT-POLAND, 2019, 23 (02): : 138 - 156
  • [9] COMPETITION BETWEEN NON-PROFIT AND FOR-PROFIT HEALTH INSURERS
    ADAMACHE, KW
    SLOAN, FA
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1983, 2 (03) : 225 - 243
  • [10] Not for the Profit, But for the Training? Gender Differences in Training in the For-Profit and Non-Profit Sectors
    Dostie, Benoit
    Javdani, Mohsen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2020, 58 (03) : 644 - 689