Comparing decentralized participatory breeding with on-station conventional sorghum breeding in Nicaragua: I. Agronomic performance

被引:8
|
作者
Trouche, Gilles [1 ]
Aguirre Acuna, Silvio [2 ]
Castro Briones, Blanca [2 ]
Gutierrez Palacios, Nury [3 ]
Lancon, Jacques [4 ]
机构
[1] CIAT Cent Amer Reg Off, CIRAD CIAT Collaborat Project Sorghum & Rice Part, LM-172 Managua, Nicaragua
[2] CIPRES, Pueblo Nuevo, Nicaragua
[3] CNIAB, INTA, Managua, Nicaragua
[4] UR SCA, CIRAD, Inst Natl Rech Agr Benin, Cotonou, Benin
关键词
Participatory breeding; Decentralized farmers' selection; Synthetic populations; Index of agronomic suitability; Sorghum; FARM VARIETAL DIVERSITY; SELECTION; RICE; CONSEQUENCES; POPULATIONS; MAIZE; BENIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2010.11.016
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Few studies have assessed the effective gains achieved by collaborative decentralized participatory breeding, in terms of yield and other agronomic traits, in comparison with centralized conventional breeding using the same breeding schemes. Our study concerned an experience of participatory improvement of tortillero sorghum for low-input cropping systems in northern Nicaragua. It set out to compare the effect of two breeding schemes simultaneously managed on-station and on-farm. Two synthetic populations were used as sources of genetic variability. The study was designed to distinguish between three "selection modes": farmers' selection on-farm (FoF), breeder' selection on-station (BoS) and breeder's selection on-farm (BoF). After two selection cycles, we found that FoF selection reduced phenotypic variability as much as BoS selection. In general, BoS selection produced higher-yielding lines under the target on-farm conditions. But FoF selection was more effective in promoting lines with higher values for an index of agronomic suitability (IAS), expressing a better balance between earliness, plant height, grain size and yield. Such genotypes might cope more easily with local environmental constraints and farmers' preferences. BoF selection did not prove to be effective for either yield or IAS. This research shows the need for close collaboration between farmers and breeders as well as complementarities between the selection phases managed on-farm and on-station, to make breeding for difficult environments fully efficient. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 28
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Comparing decentralized participatory breeding with on-station conventional sorghum breeding in Nicaragua: II. Farmer acceptance and index of global value
    Trouche, G.
    Lancon, J.
    Acuna, S. Aguirre
    Briones, B. Castro
    Thomas, G.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2012, 126 : 70 - 78
  • [2] On-station farmer participatory varietal evaluation: a strategy for client oriented breeding
    Baidu-Forson, J.
    Experimental Agriculture, 33 (01):
  • [3] Valorisation of genetic diversity of sorghum through participatory breeding in Nicaragua
    Trouche, Gilles
    Acuna, Silvio Aguirre
    Hocde, Henri
    Solis, Rafael Obando
    Wong, Zildghean Chow
    CAHIERS AGRICULTURES, 2008, 17 (02): : 154 - 159
  • [4] On-station farmer participatory varietal evaluation: A strategy for client-oriented breeding
    BaiduForson, J
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1997, 33 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [5] Comparison of the Agronomic Performance between a Pigeonpea Hybrid and Five Breeding Lines Developed through Conventional Breeding
    Vazquez, Roberto, III
    Linares-Ramirez, Angela M.
    Viteri, Diego M.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2024, 59 (08) : 1133 - 1136
  • [6] A methodological study on participatory barley breeding I. Selection phase
    S. Ceccarelli
    S. Grando
    R. Tutwiler
    J. Baha
    A.M. Martini
    H. Salahieh
    A. Goodchild
    M. Michael
    Euphytica, 2000, 111 : 91 - 104
  • [7] A methodological study on participatory barley breeding - I. Selection phase
    Ceccarelli, S
    Grando, S
    Tutwiler, R
    Baha, J
    Martini, AM
    Salahieh, H
    Goodchild, A
    Michael, M
    EUPHYTICA, 2000, 111 (02) : 91 - 104
  • [8] Agronomic Evaluation of Bread Wheat Varieties from Participatory Breeding: A Combination of Performance and Robustness
    Goldringer, Isabelle
    van Frank, Gaelle
    d'Yvoire, Caroline Bouvier
    Forst, Emma
    Galic, Nathalie
    Garnault, Maxime
    Locqueville, Jonathan
    Pin, Sophie
    Bailly, Julien
    Baltassat, Raphael
    Berthellot, Jean-Francois
    Caizergues, Francois
    Dalmasso, Christian
    de Kochko, Patrick
    Gascuel, Jean-Sebastien
    Hyacinthe, Alexandre
    Lacanette, Julien
    Mercier, Florent
    Montaz, Helene
    Ronot, Bernard
    Riviere, Pierre
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [9] Participatory plant breeding is better described as highly client-oriented plant breeding. I. Four indicators of client-orientation in plant breeding
    Witcombe, JR
    Joshi, KD
    Gyawali, S
    Musa, AM
    Johansen, C
    Virk, DS
    Sthapit, BR
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2005, 41 (03) : 299 - 319
  • [10] Farmer Participatory Crop Improvement. I. Varietal Selection and Breeding Methods and Their Impact on Biodiversity
    Witcombe, J. R.
    Joshi, A.
    Joshi, K. D.
    Sthapit, B. R.
    Experimental Agriculture, 32 (04):