Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science

被引:125
作者
Masse, Louise C. [1 ]
Moser, Richard P. [2 ]
Stokols, Daniel [4 ]
Taylor, Brandie K. [3 ]
Marcus, Stephen E. [2 ]
Morgan, Glen D. [2 ]
Hall, Kara L. [2 ]
Croyle, Robert T. [2 ]
Trochim, William M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pediat, Ctr Community Child Hlth Res, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
[2] NCI, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NIH, Off Portfolio Anal & Strateg Initiat, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Social Ecol, Irvine, CA USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Policy Anal & Management, Ithaca, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: As the science of team science evolves, the development of measures that assess important processes related to working in transdisciplinary teams is critical. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present the psychometric properties of scales measuring collaborative processes and transdisciplinary integration. Methods: Two hundred-sixteen researchers and research staff participating in the Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers (TTURC) Initiative completed the TTURC researcher survey. Confirmatory-factor analyses were used to verify the hypothesized factor structures. Descriptive data pertinent to these scales and their associations with other constructs were included to further examine the properties of the scales. Results: Overall, the hypothesized-factor structures, with some minor modifications, were validated. A total of four scales were developed, three to assess collaborative processes (satisfaction with the collaboration, impact of collaboration, trust and respect) and one to assess transdisciplinary integration. All scales were found to have adequate internal consistency (i.e., Cronbach alpha's were all >0.70); were correlated with intermediate markers of collaborations (e.g., the collaboration and transdisciplinary-integration scales were positively associated with the perception of a center's making good progress in creating new methods, new science and models, and new interventions); and showed some ability to detect group differences. Conclusions: This paper provides valid tools that can be utilized to examine the underlying processes of team science-an important step toward advancing the science of team science.
引用
收藏
页码:S151 / S160
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Abrams David B, 2003, Nicotine Tob Res, V5 Suppl 1, pS5
[2]   The discovery value of "big science" [J].
Esparza, Jose ;
Yamada, Tadataka .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2007, 204 (04) :701-704
[3]  
GRAY B, 1996, CROSS SECTORAL PARTN
[4]  
Gray B., 1989, COLLABORATING FINDIN
[5]  
Hu L., 1995, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, P76, DOI DOI 10.1080/10705519909540118
[6]  
Kessel F., 2003, EXPANDING BOUNDARIES
[7]  
Kessel F., 2008, INTERDISCIPLINARY RE
[8]  
Klein J.T., 1996, CROSSING BOUNDARIES
[9]   Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research - A literature review [J].
Klein, Julie T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (02) :S116-S123
[10]   Rescuing the NIH before it is too late [J].
Marks, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2006, 116 (04) :844-844