Does the Rights Hypothesis Apply to China?

被引:37
作者
Long, Cheryl Xiaoning [1 ]
机构
[1] Colgate Univ, Hamilton, NY 13346 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/649031
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using firm-level data from a World Bank survey, this paper examines how legal development in China relates to various firm decisions. I find that a more active court system is associated with more investment, more adoption of technology, more innovation, and more complex transactions. Specifically, when a higher percentage of business disputes are resolved through the court system, firms tend to have higher investment rates, higher propensities to adopt new automated technology, and higher probabilities of developing new products. In addition, they tend to have more nonlocal sales. These findings are consistent with a sophisticated version of the rights hypothesis, in which the rule of law eventually replaces relation-based governance as a superior governance mechanism. I find two limitations of China's legal system. The court system does a better job facilitating the growth of state-owned enterprises than of private firms, and it protects local firms better than nonlocal firms.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 650
页数:22
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) :1369-1401
[2]  
ACEMOGLU D, 2007, AM ECON REV, V97, P637
[3]  
*CHIN STAT BUR, 2010, COMP STAT 1949 2009
[4]  
CLARKE DC, 2005, CHINAS EC RETROSPECT, P42
[5]  
Clarke Donald., 2006, ROLE LAW CHINAS EC D
[6]   Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development [J].
Easterly, W ;
Levine, R .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2003, 50 (01) :3-39
[7]   Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? [J].
Hall, RE ;
Jones, CI .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 114 (01) :83-116
[8]  
Huang R., 1997, CHINA MACROHIST
[9]  
Huang Ray., 1981, 1587, a year of no significance : the Ming dynasty in decline
[10]   Entrepreneurs and the ordering of institutional reform -: Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine compared [J].
Johnson, S ;
McMillan, J ;
Woodruff, C .
ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION, 2000, 8 (01) :1-36