Effect of EEG Referencing Methods on Auditory Mismatch Negativity

被引:15
|
作者
Mahajan, Yatin [1 ,2 ]
Peter, Varghese [1 ]
Sharma, Mridula [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, MARCS Inst Brain Behav & Dev, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[2] HEARing CRC, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Dept Linguist, Australian Hearing Hub, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE | 2017年 / 11卷
关键词
mismatch negativity; event related potential; reference; REST; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; INFINITY REFERENCE; AVERAGE REFERENCE; BRAIN POTENTIALS; SYSTEM ACTIVITY; SPEECH STIMULI; T-COMPLEX; CHILDREN; MATURATION;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2017.00560
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) have consistently been used in the investigation of auditory and cognitive processing in the research and clinical laboratories. There is currently no consensus on the choice of appropriate reference for auditory ERPs. The most commonly used references in auditory ERR research are the mathematically linked-mastoids (LM) and average referencing (AVG). Since LM and AVG referencing procedures do not solve the issue of electrically-neutral reference, Reference Electrode Standardization Technique (REST) was developed to create a neutral reference for EEG recordings. The aim of the current research is to compare the influence of the reference on amplitude and latency of auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) as a function of magnitude of frequency deviance across three commonly used electrode montages (16, 32, and 64-channel) using REST, LM, and AVG reference procedures. The current study was designed to determine if the three reference methods capture the variation in amplitude and latency of MMN with the deviance magnitude. We recorded MMN from 12 normal hearing young adults in an auditory oddball paradigm with 1,000 Hz pure tone as standard and 1,030, 1,100, and 1,200 Hz as small, medium and large frequency deviants, respectively. The EEG data recorded to these sounds was re-referenced using REST, LM, and AVG methods across 16-, 32-, and 64-channel EEG electrode montages. Results revealed that while the latency of MMN decreased with increment in frequency of deviant sounds, no effect of frequency deviance was present for amplitude of MMN. There was no effect of referencing procedure on the experimental effect tested. The amplitude of MMN was largest when the ERR was computed using LM referencing and the REST referencing produced the largest amplitude of MMN for 64-channel montage. There was no effect of electrode-montage on AVG referencing induced ERPs. Contrary to our predictions, the results suggest that the auditory MMN elicited as a function of increments in frequency deviance does not depend on the choice of referencing procedure. The results also suggest that auditory ERPs generated using REST referencing is contingent on the electrode arrays more than the AVG referencing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Auditory mismatch: Not every mismatch-related negativity is a mismatch negativity
    Kotchoubey, B
    Lang, S
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) : 243 - 243
  • [2] The effect of auditory and visual training on the mismatch negativity in schizophrenia
    Kaergel, Christian
    Sartory, Gudrun
    Kariofillis, Daniela
    Wiltfang, Jens
    Mueller, Bernhard W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 102 : 47 - 54
  • [3] No effect of focused attention and open monitoring meditation on EEG auditory mismatch negativity in expert and novice practitioners
    Fucci, Enrico
    Poublan-Couzardot, Arnaud
    Abdoun, Oussama
    Lutz, Antoine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 176 : 62 - 72
  • [4] Cervical dystonia: Normal auditory mismatch negativity and abnormal somatosensory mismatch negativity
    Chen, Jui-Cheng
    Macerollo, Antonella
    Sadnicka, Anna
    Lu, Min-Kuei
    Tsai, Chon-Haw
    Korlipara, Prasad
    Bhatia, Kailash
    Rothwell, John C.
    Edwards, Mark J.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 129 (09) : 1947 - 1954
  • [5] The Thalamocortical Circuit of Auditory Mismatch Negativity
    Lakatos, Peter
    O'Connell, Monica N.
    Barczak, Annamaria
    McGinnis, Tammy
    Neymotin, Samuel
    Schroeder, Charles E.
    Smiley, John F.
    Javitt, Daniel C.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 87 (08) : 770 - 780
  • [6] Mismatch negativity -: A microphone into auditory memory
    Schroeger, Erich
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (3-4) : 138 - 146
  • [7] MISMATCH NEGATIVITY IN AUDITORY RECOGNITION MASKING
    WINKLER, I
    NAATANEN, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 11 (01) : 88 - 88
  • [8] Mismatch Negativity in Children with Deficits in Auditory Abilities
    Pinto, Julia Dalcin
    Temp, Deborah Aurelio
    Ferreira, Lais
    de Souza, Amalia El Hatal
    Garcia, Michele Vargas
    de Andrade, Adriana Neves
    Vieira Biaggio, Eliara Pinto
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 28 (04) : e568 - e573
  • [9] Evidence for visual analogue of auditory mismatch negativity
    Maekawa, Toshihiko
    Kanba, Shigenobu
    Tobimatsu, Shozo
    2007 IEEE/ICME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX MEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 1507 - +
  • [10] Auditory Mismatch Negativity in Schizophrenia: A Neurodevelopmental Perspective
    Corcoran, Cheryl
    Martinez, Antigona
    Dias, Elisa
    Stoops, Anastasia
    Sehatpour, Pejman
    Javitt, Daniel
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 40 : S404 - S404