Binary quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of estrogen receptor ligands

被引:100
作者
Gao, H
Williams, C
Labute, P
Bajorath, J
机构
[1] MDS Panlabs, Computat Chem & Informat, Bothell, WA 98011 USA
[2] Chem Comp Grp Inc, Montreal, PQ H3B 3X3, Canada
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biol Struct, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES | 1999年 / 39卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci980140g
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The use of high throughput screening (HTS) to identify lead compounds has greatly challenged conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) techniques that typically correlate structural variations in similar compounds with continuous changes in biological activity. A new QSAR-like methodology that can correlate less quantitative assay data (i.e., "active" versus "inactive"), as initially generated by HTS, has been introduced. In the present study, we have, for the first time, applied this approach to a drug discovery problem; that is, the study of estrogen receptor ligands. The binding affinities of 463 estrogen analogues were transformed into a binary data format, and a predictive binary QSAR model was derived using 410 estrogen analogues as a training set. The model was applied to predict the activity of 53 estrogen analogues not included in the training set. An overall accuracy of 94% was obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 168
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules? [J].
Ajay ;
Walters, WP ;
Murcko, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 41 (18) :3314-3324
[2]   The estradiol pharmacophore: Ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site [J].
Anstead, GM ;
Carlson, KE ;
Katzenellenbogen, JA .
STEROIDS, 1997, 62 (03) :268-303
[3]   CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF THE LIGAND-BINDING DOMAIN OF THE HUMAN NUCLEAR RECEPTOR RXR-ALPHA [J].
BOURGUET, W ;
RUFF, M ;
CHAMBON, P ;
GRONEMEYER, H ;
MORAS, D .
NATURE, 1995, 375 (6530) :377-382
[4]   Use of structure Activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection [J].
Brown, RD ;
Martin, YC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1996, 36 (03) :572-584
[5]   Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor [J].
Brzozowski, AM ;
Pike, ACW ;
Dauter, Z ;
Hubbard, RE ;
Bonn, T ;
Engstrom, O ;
Ohman, L ;
Greene, GL ;
Gustafsson, JA ;
Carlquist, M .
NATURE, 1997, 389 (6652) :753-758
[6]  
*CHEM COMP GROUP I, MOE 1998 03
[7]   CROSS-VALIDATION, BOOTSTRAPPING, AND PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES COMPARED WITH MULTIPLE-REGRESSION IN CONVENTIONAL QSAR STUDIES [J].
CRAMER, RD ;
BUNCE, JD ;
PATTERSON, DE ;
FRANK, IE .
QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS, 1988, 7 (01) :18-25
[8]   COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR-FIELD ANALYSIS (COMFA) .1. EFFECT OF SHAPE ON BINDING OF STEROIDS TO CARRIER PROTEINS [J].
CRAMER, RD ;
PATTERSON, DE ;
BUNCE, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 110 (18) :5959-5967
[9]   QSAR of P450 oxidation: On the value of comparing k(cat) and K-m with k(cat)/K-m [J].
Gao, H ;
Hansch, C .
DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 1996, 28 (04) :513-526
[10]  
GAO H, IN PRESS CHEM REV