How to understand the knowledge norm of assertion: Reply to Schloder

Julian Schloder (2018) examines Timothy Williamson's proposal that knowledge is the norm of assertion within the context of deontic logic. He argues for two claims, one concerning the formalisation of the thesis that knowledge is a norm of assertion and another concerning the formalisation of the thesis that knowledge is the only norm of assertion. On the basis of these claims, Schloder goes on to raise a series of problems for Williamson's proposal. In response, I argue that both of Schloder's claims can-and should-be rejected.