The Effect of Telehealth Interventions on Quality of Life of Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:90
|
作者
Larson, Jamie L. [1 ]
Rosen, Adam B. [2 ]
Wilson, Fernando A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Adm, 984350 Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Coll Educ, Sch Hlth & Kinesiol, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
关键词
telehealth; telemedicine; telepsychiatry; e-health; COLORECTAL FACT-C; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; TELEMENTAL HEALTH; THERAPY; FEASIBILITY; COMMUNICATION; SATISFACTION; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; DISTRESS;
D O I
10.1089/tmj.2017.0112
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction:In 2016, approximate to 1.7 million new cases of cancer were diagnosed. Cancer patients can have physical, functional, and psychosocial issues when dealing with cancer treatment. Telehealth has been effectively introduced to help deliver treatment to patients suffering from chronic disease; however, there is little consensus on its effectiveness in administering sociobehavioral cancer treatments. Thus, this study determines the benefits of telehealth-based interventions providing emotional and symptom support in improving quality of life (QOL) among cancer patients. Methods:Two researchers conducted comprehensive searches on PubMed, SCOPUS, Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, Psychology and Behavioral Collection, and Medline Complete. Key search terms included telehealth or telemedicine and QOL and cancer. Articles were included if they assessed a telehealth-delivered intervention for adult cancer patients and provided a QOL assessment. Data were extracted to calculate mean effect sizes for QOL measures on the effectiveness of telehealth relative to usual care (UC) for cancer treatments.Results:Out of 414 articles identified in our initial search, nine articles fit our inclusion criteria. Both telehealth (Hedges g=0.211, p=0.016) and standard of care (Hedges g=0.217, p < 0.001) cancer treatment delivery methods demonstrated small, but statistically significant improvements in QOL measures. However, there were no statistically significant differences in effectiveness between the telehealth interventions and UC (p=0.76). Conclusions:The results indicate that telehealth interventions are as effective at improving QOL scores in patients undergoing cancer treatment as in-person UC. Further studies should be undertaken on different modalities of telehealth to determine its appropriate and effective use in interventions to improve the QOL for cancer patients undergoing treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 405
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of telehealth interventions on quality of life of cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Larson, Jamie L.
    Rosen, Adam B.
    Wilson, Fernando A.
    HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (02) : 1060 - 1078
  • [2] The Effect of Spiritual Interventions on Quality of Life of Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kruizinga, Renske
    Hartog, Iris
    Jacobs, Marc
    Daams, Joost
    Scherer-Rath, Michael
    Schilderman, Hans
    Sprangers, Mirjam
    van Laarhoven, Hanneke
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 : 268 - 269
  • [3] Effect of telehealth interventions on quality of life in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Juejin
    Liu, Yong
    Jiang, Jianjun
    Peng, Xingchen
    Hu, Xiaolin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2021, 122
  • [4] Effect of psychosocial interventions on the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Heesook Son
    Youn-Jung Son
    Hyerang Kim
    Yoonju Lee
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16
  • [5] Effect of psychosocial interventions on the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Son, Heesook
    Son, Youn-Jung
    Kim, Hyerang
    Lee, Yoonju
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2018, 16
  • [6] The effect of psychological interventions on quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Calver, L.
    Tickle, A.
    Moghaddam, N.
    Biswas, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2018, 27 (01)
  • [7] Telehealth improves quality of life of COPD patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ariyanto, Heri
    Maria, Elsye
    KONTAKT-JOURNAL OF NURSING AND SOCIAL SCIENCES RELATED TO HEALTH AND ILLNESS, 2024, 26 (03): : 252 - 259
  • [8] The effect of lifestyle interventions on the quality of life of gynaecological cancer survivors A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Smits, Anke
    Lopes, Alberto
    Das, Nagindra
    Bekkers, Ruud
    Massuger, Leon
    Galaal, Khadra
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 139 (03) : 546 - 552
  • [9] Can mHealth interventions improve quality of life of cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buneviciene, Inesa
    Mekary, Rania A.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Onnela, Jukka-Pekka
    Bunevicius, Adomas
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 157
  • [10] Impact of interventions on the quality of life of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal research
    Nguyen, Long Bao
    Vu, Linh Gia
    Le, Thanh Thien
    Nguyen, Xuan Thanh
    Dao, Nam Gia
    Nguyen, Duy Cao
    Dang, Trang Huyen Thi
    Vu, Thuc Minh Thi
    Boyer, Laurent
    Fond, Guillaume
    Auquier, Pascal
    Latkin, Carl A.
    Zhang, Melvyn W. B.
    Ho, Roger C. M.
    Ho, Cyrus S. H.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2023, 21 (01)