Software Model Checking Using Languages of Nested Trees

被引:17
|
作者
Alur, Rajeev [1 ]
Chaudhuri, Swarat [2 ]
Madhusudan, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Rice Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL 61802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Algorithms; Theory; Verification; Logic; specification; verification; mu-calculus; infinite-state; model-checking; games; pushdown systems; interprocedural analysis; TEMPORAL LOGIC;
D O I
10.1145/2039346.2039347
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
While model checking of pushdown systems is by now an established technique in software verification, temporal logics and automata traditionally used in this area are unattractive on two counts. First, logics and automata traditionally used in model checking cannot express requirements such as pre/post-conditions that are basic to analysis of software. Second, unlike in the finite-state world, where the mu-calculus has a symbolic model-checking algorithm and serves as an "assembly language" to which temporal logics can be compiled, there is no common formalism-either fixpoint-based or automata-theoretic-to model-check requirements on pushdown models. In this article, we introduce a new theory of temporal logics and automata that addresses the above issues, and provides a unified foundation for the verification of pushdown systems. The key idea here is to view a program as a generator of structures known as nested trees as opposed to trees. A fixpoint logic (called NT-mu) and a class of automata (called nested tree automata) interpreted on languages of these structures are now defined, and branching-time model-checking is phrased as language inclusion and membership problems for these languages. We show that NT-mu and nested tree automata allow the specification of a new frontier of requirements usable in software verification. At the same time, their model checking problem has the same worst-case complexity as their traditional analogs, and can be solved symbolically using a fixpoint computation that generalizes, and includes as a special case, "summary"-based computations traditionally used in interprocedural program analysis. We also show that our logics and automata define a robust class of languages-in particular, just as the mu-calculus is equivalent to alternating parity automata on trees, NT-mu is equivalent to alternating parity automata on nested trees. Categories and Subject Descriptors: D. 2.4 [Software Engineering]: Software/Program Verification-Model checking; F. 1.1 [Computation by abstract devices]: Models of computation-Automata; F. 3.1 [Theory of Computation]: Specifying and Verifying and Reasoning about Programs; F. 4.1 [Theory of Computation]: Mathematical Logic-Temporal logic
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FO Model Checking on Nested Pushdown Trees
    Kartzow, Alexander
    MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE 2009, 2009, 5734 : 451 - 463
  • [2] Languages of nested trees
    Alur, Rajeev
    Chaudhuri, Swarat
    Madhusudan, P.
    COMPUTER AIDED VERIFICATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4144 : 329 - 342
  • [3] Model checking software for phylogenetic trees using distribution and database methods
    Ignacio Requeno, Jose
    Manuel Colom, Jose
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 10 (03)
  • [4] Checking nested properties using bounded model checking and sequential ATPG
    Qiang, Q
    Saab, DG
    Abraham, JA
    19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VLSI DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 225 - 230
  • [5] Using software model checking for software component certification
    Taleghani, Ali
    29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: ICSE 2007 COMPANION VOLUME, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 99 - 100
  • [6] Regular Model Checking Using Inference of Regular Languages
    Habermehl, Peter
    Vojnar, Tomas
    ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2005, 138 (03) : 21 - 36
  • [7] Software model checking using linear constraints
    Armando, A
    Castellini, C
    Mantovani, J
    FORMAL METHODS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3308 : 209 - 223
  • [8] Automatic software model checking using CLP
    Flanagan, C
    PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS, 2003, 2618 : 189 - 203
  • [9] Checking JML specifications using an extensible software model checking framework
    Edwin Robby
    Matthew B. Rodríguez
    John Dwyer
    International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2006, 8 (3) : 280 - 299
  • [10] Checking strong specifications using an extensible software model checking framework
    Robby
    Rodríguez, E
    Dwyer, MB
    Hatcliff, J
    TOOLS AND ALGORITHMS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 2988 : 404 - 420