Validity and reliability of the Turkish "Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation" questionnaire

被引:15
|
作者
Ozturk, Ozgul [1 ]
Sari, Zubeyir [2 ]
Ozgul, Bahar [2 ]
Tasyikan, Levent [3 ]
机构
[1] Turkish Red Crescent Altintepe Med Ctr, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Caycuma Publ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Zonguldak, Turkey
关键词
Disability; outcome questionnaire; PRWE; Turkish version; validity; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; EVALUATION PRWE; SWEDISH VERSION; DISABILITY; VALIDATION; GERMAN; HAND; PAIN;
D O I
10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0208
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scale is a self-administered outcome questionnaire used to determine level of pain and disability in wrist problems. The scale includes pain (PRWE-P) and function (PRWE-F) subscales, the latter consisting of specific function (PRWE-SF) and usual (PRWE-UF) function. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the PRWE scale. Methods: Permission was sought and received from the original author of the PRWE for a Turkish translation for use in the study. The study included 110 patients (85 female and 25 male; mean age: 50.8 +/- 1.53 years; range: 18 to 85) with distal radius fracture, carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist ganglion cyst, De Quervain syndrome, Kienbock disease, and connective lesions affecting the wrist, all of whom completed the Turkish version of both the PRWE (PRWE-T) and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand scale (DASH). Reliability and validity of the PRWE-T scale were evaluated via an internal consistency analysis and a factor analysis respectively. The level of correlation between PRWE-T and DASH scores was also examined. Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated as 0.86, 0.82 and 0.88 for PRWE-P, PRWE-F and PRWE-T respectively for the scale and all subscales. The PRWE-T scale was found to be highly reliable. A statistically significant correlation was found between PRWE-T and DASH in the criterion-related validity analysis (Spearman's rho=0.9). Conclusion: The PRWE-T was found to be valid and reliable. It is therefore suggested for use in evaluating patient-based pain and disability levels in routine clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 125
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis
    Tuna, Zeynep
    Mete, Oguzhan
    Tore, Gizem
    Ventur, Songul Baglan
    Varan, Ozkan
    Goker, Berna
    Oskay, Deran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 22 (09) : 1714 - 1718
  • [2] Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the French translation of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE)
    Bastard, Claire
    Sandman, Emilie
    Balg, Frederic
    Patenaude, Nicolas
    Chapleau, Julien
    Rouleau, Dominique
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2024, 110 (02)
  • [3] Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire
    Topcu, Deniz Oke
    Afsar, Sevgi Ikbali
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 49 (02) : 574 - +
  • [4] Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation
    Imaeda, Toshihiko
    Uchiyama, Shigeharu
    Wada, Takuro
    Okinaga, Shuji
    Sawaizumi, Takuya
    Omokawa, Shohei
    Momose, Toshimitsu
    Moritomo, Hisao
    Gotani, Hiroyuki
    Abe, Yukio
    Nishida, Jun
    Kanaya, Fuminori
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2010, 15 (04) : 509 - 517
  • [5] Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire
    Mohammad Reza Farazdaghi
    Ali Mansoori
    Omid Vosoughi
    Amin Kordi Yoosefinejad
    Rheumatology International, 2017, 37 : 743 - 750
  • [6] Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire
    Farazdaghi, Mohammad Reza
    Mansoori, Ali
    Vosoughi, Omid
    Yoosefinejad, Amin Kordi
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 37 (05) : 743 - 750
  • [7] Normative data for the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire
    Mulders, Marjolein A. M.
    Kleipool, Suzanne C.
    Dingemans, Siem A.
    van Eerten, Percy, V
    Schepers, Tim
    Goslings, J. Carel
    Schep, Niels W. L.
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2018, 31 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [8] Rasch analysis of the patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire
    Esakki S.
    MacDermid J.C.
    Vincent J.I.
    Packham T.L.
    Walton D.
    Grewal R.
    Archives of Physiotherapy, 8 (1)
  • [9] Construct validity of the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation questionnaire (PRWHE) for nerve repair in the hand
    Registro Fonseca, Marisa C.
    Lalone, Emily
    da Silva, Natalia Claro
    Mendes Sugano, Raquel Metzker
    Barbosa, Rafael, I
    Marcolino, Alexandre M.
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 40 : 40 - 44
  • [10] Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation
    Zeynep Hazar Kanik
    Omer Osman Pala
    Gul Oznur Karabicak
    Seyit Citaker
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2019, 38 : 3289 - 3295