Radiological changes, infections and neurological complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: Part II

被引:5
|
作者
Nabergoj, Marko [1 ,2 ]
Denard, Patrick J. [3 ]
Collin, Philippe [4 ]
Trebse, Rihard [1 ,2 ]
Laedermann, Alexandre [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Valdoltra Orthopaed Hosp, Ankaran, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Oregon Shoulder Inst, Medford, OR USA
[4] Vivalto Sante, Ctr Hosp Prive St Gregoire, St Gregoire, France
[5] La Tour Hosp, Div Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Av JD Maillard 3, CH-1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
[6] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[7] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
infection; intraoperative cement extravasation; neurologic lesion; problems; prosthesis design; PROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; PREOPERATIVE ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; RISK-FACTORS; AXILLARY NERVE; RADIOGRAPHIC CHANGES; GLENOID COMPONENT; DEEP INFECTION; REVISION; FRACTURES; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1302/2058-5241.6.210040
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Early reported complication rates with the Grammont-type reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were very high, up to 24%. A 'problem' is defined as an intraoperative or postopera -tive event that is not likely to affect the patient's final out -come, such as intraoperative cement extravasation and radiographic changes. A 'complication' is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is likely to affect the patient's final outcome, including infection, neurologic injury and intrathoracic central glenoid screw placement. Radiographic changes around the glenoid or humeral components of the RSA are very frequently observed and described in the literature. High complication rates related to the Grammont RSA design led to development of non-Grammont designs which led to a dramatic fall in the majority of complications. The percentage of radiological changes after RSA is not negligible and remains unsolved, despite a decrease in its occurrence in the last decade. However, such changes should be now considered as simple problems because they rarely have a negative influence on the patient's final outcome, and their prevalence has dramatically decreased. With further changes in indications and designs for RSA, it is crucial to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its new designs and increased indications.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1121
页数:13
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Mechanical complications and fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: part I
    Nabergoj, Marko
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Collin, Philippe
    Trebse, Rihard
    Laedermann, Alexandre
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2021, 6 (11) : 1097 - 1108
  • [2] Patient reported activities after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: part II
    Lawrence, Thomas M.
    Ahmadi, Shahryar
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Sperling, John W.
    Cofield, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (11) : 1464 - 1469
  • [3] Osteoporosis and Implant-Related Complications After Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Casp, Aaron J.
    Montgomery, Samuel R., Jr.
    Cancienne, Jourdan M.
    Brockmeier, Stephen F.
    Werner, Brian C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (03) : 121 - 127
  • [4] An evaluation of the radiological changes around the Grammont reverse geometry shoulder arthroplasty after eight to 12 years
    Melis, B.
    DeFranco, M.
    Laedermann, A.
    Mole, D.
    Favard, L.
    Nerot, C.
    Maynou, C.
    Walch, G.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (09): : 1240 - 1246
  • [5] Are Age and Patient Gender Associated With Different Rates and Magnitudes of Clinical Improvement After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?
    Friedman, Richard J.
    Cheung, Emilie V.
    Flurin, Pierre-Henri
    Wright, Thomas
    Simovitch, Ryan W.
    Bolch, Charlotte
    Roche, Christopher P.
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (06) : 1264 - 1273
  • [6] A cohort comparison of humeral implant designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: does implant design lead to lower rates of complications and revision?
    Gorman, R. Allen, II
    Christmas, Kaitlyn N.
    Simon, Peter
    Mighell, Mark A.
    Frankle, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (04) : 850 - 857
  • [7] CORR Insights®: Are Age and Patient Gender Associated With Different Rates and Magnitudes of Clinical Improvement After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?
    Lynch, Joseph R.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (06) : 1274 - 1275
  • [8] The relationship between design-based lateralization, humeral bearing design, polyethylene angle, and patient-related factors on surgical complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a machine learning analysis
    Marigi, Erick M.
    Oeding, Jacob F.
    Nieboer, Micah
    Marigi, Ian M.
    Wahlig, Brian
    Barlow, Jonathan D.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Sperling, John W.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (02) : 462 - 472
  • [9] A quantitative analysis of deltoid lengthening and deltoid-related complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective case-control study
    Acott, Thomas R.
    Brolin, Tyler J.
    Azar, Frederick M.
    Smith, Richard A.
    Throckmorton, Thomas W.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2020, 31 (02): : 126 - 132
  • [10] Range of Impingement-Free Abduction and Adduction Deficit After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Hierarchy of Surgical and Implant-Design-Related Factors
    Gutierrez, Sergio
    Comiskey, Charles A., IV
    Luo, Zong-Ping
    Pupello, Derek R.
    Frankle, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (12): : 2606 - 2615