Mining Suspicious Tax Evasion Groups in a Corporate Governance Network

被引:3
|
作者
Wei, Wenda [1 ]
Yan, Zheng [2 ,3 ]
Ruan, Jianfei [1 ]
Zheng, Qinghua [1 ]
Dong, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, SPKLSTN Lab, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Xidian Univ, State Key Lab Integrated Serv Networks, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Aalto Univ, Dept Commun & Networking, Espoo, Finland
来源
ALGORITHMS AND ARCHITECTURES FOR PARALLEL PROCESSING, ICA3PP 2017 | 2017年 / 10393卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Tax evasion; Controller interlock; Corporate Governance Network; Big data; INTERLOCKS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-65482-9_33
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There is a new tendency for corporations to evade tax via Interest Affiliated Transactions (IAT) that are controlled by a potential "Guanxi" between the corporations' controllers. At the same time, the taxation data is a classic kind of big data. These issues challenge the effectiveness of traditional data mining-based tax evasion detection methods. To address this problem, we first coin a definition of controller interlock, which characterizes the interlocking relationship between corporations' controllers. Next, we present a colored and weighted network-based model for characterizing economic behaviors, controller interlock and other relationships, and IATs between corporations, and generate a heterogeneous information network-corporate governance network. Then, we further propose a novel Graph-based Suspicious Groups of Interlock based tax evasion Identification method, named GSG2I, which mainly consists of two steps: controller interlock pattern recognition and suspicious group identification. Experimental tests based on a real-world 7-year period tax data of one province in China, demonstrate that the GSG2I method can greatly improve the efficiency of tax evasion detection.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 475
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mining Suspicious Tax Evasion Groups in Big Data
    Tian, Feng
    Lan, Tian
    Chao, Kuo-Ming
    Godwin, Nick
    Zheng, Qinghua
    Shah, Nazaraf
    Zhang, Fan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2016, 28 (10) : 2651 - 2664
  • [2] Mining Suspicious Tax Evasion Groups in Big Data
    Tian, Feng
    Lan, Tian
    Zheng, Qinghua
    Chao, Kuo-Ming
    Godwin, Nick
    Shah, Nazaraf
    Zhang, Fan
    2017 IEEE 33RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING (ICDE 2017), 2017, : 25 - 26
  • [3] TaxThemis: Interactive Mining and Exploration of Suspicious Tax Evasion Groups
    Lin, Yating
    Wong, Kamkwai
    Wang, Yong
    Zhang, Rong
    Dong, Bo
    Qu, Huamin
    Zheng, Qinghua
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2021, 27 (02) : 849 - 859
  • [4] ATTENet: Detecting and Explaining Suspicious Tax Evasion Groups
    Zheng, Qinghua
    Lin, Yating
    He, Huan
    Ruan, Jianfei
    Dong, Bo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 6584 - 6586
  • [5] Find the Most Suspicious Tax Evasion Groups from a Taxpayer Interest Interacted Network
    Tian, Feng
    Wan, Xing
    Lan, Tian
    Qi, Tianliang
    Zheng, Qinghua
    Chao, Kuo-Ming
    Li, Longzhuang
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2016, : 3624 - 3629
  • [6] Identifying suspicious groups of affiliated-transaction-based tax evasion in big data
    Ruan, Jianfei
    Yan, Zheng
    Dong, Bo
    Zheng, Qinghua
    Qian, Buyue
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 477 : 508 - 532
  • [7] Intelligent Identification of Corporate Tax Evasion Based on LM Neural Network
    Xing Xiangyu
    Ye Youlin
    Xu Qicheng
    2018 37TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2018, : 4507 - 4511
  • [8] Tax Evasion, Corporate Social Responsibility and National Governance: A Country-Level Study
    Montenegro, Tania Menezes
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [9] Corporate tax evasion: The case for specialists
    Lipatov, Vilen
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 81 (01) : 185 - 206
  • [10] Corporate tax evasion with agency costs
    Crocker, KJ
    Slemrod, J
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (9-10) : 1593 - 1610