A system dynamics approach for investigating impacts of incentive mechanisms on wind power investment

被引：65

作者：

Alishahi, E. ^{[1
]}

Moghaddam, M. Parsa ^{[1
]}

Sheikh-El-Eslami, M. K. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, Tehran, Iran

来源：

RENEWABLE ENERGY | 2012年 / 37卷 / 01期

关键词：

Generation expansion planning; Wind power generation; Regulatory interventions; Incentive mechanism; System dynamics; FEED-IN TARIFF; ELECTRICITY MARKETS; GENERATION; SIMULATION; PROGRAMS; POLICIES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.026

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Large integration of intermittent wind generation in power system has necessitated the inclusion of more innovative and sophisticated approaches in power system investment planning. The intermittent nature and uncertainties of wind power generation will cause the investors encounter risk in their investment decisions. Main factors such as uncertainties in demand, fuel price, wind power generation which affect long-term planning have been considered in the proposed model. To overcome this problem i.e. risk impacts on decisions, this paper presents improved incentive mechanisms for wind power investment. The mechanism has been investigated based on system dynamics modeling. In the proposed mechanism, wind power generations will recover a part of their investment cost through incentive mechanisms. In this paper, different incentive methods some of which are dependent to market conditions are being proposed. The functionality of these incentive mechanisms on wind generation investment are illustrated by simulation studies. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：310 / 317

页数：8

共 33 条

[1] Overview of government and market driven programs for the promotion of renewable power generation [J].

Ackermann, T ;

Andersson, G ;

Söder, L .

RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2001, 22 (1-3) :197-204

[2]

ARANGO S, 2007, J SOCIOECONOMIC PLAN, V41, P305

[3] An improved mechanism for capacity payment based on system dynamics modeling for investment planning in competitive electricity environment [J].

Assili, Mohsen ;

Javidi D B, M. Hossein ;

Ghazi, Reza .

ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (10) :3703-3713

[4] Evaluation of Regulatory Impacts on Dynamic Behavior of Investments in Electricity Markets: A New Hybrid DP/GAME Framework [J].

Barforoushi, Taghi ;

Moghaddam, Mohsen P. ;

Javidi, M. Hossein ;

Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad K. .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (04) :1978-1986

[5] The Green Effect [J].

Barroso, Luiz A. ;

Rudnick, Hugh ;

Sensfuss, Frank ;

Linares, Pedro .

IEEE POWER & ENERGY MAGAZINE, 2010, 8 (05) :22-35

[6] Optimal investments in power generation under centralized and decentralized decision making [J].

Botterud, A ;

Ilic, MD ;

Wangensteen, I .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (01) :254-263

[7] Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development [J].

Butler, Lucy ;

Neuhoff, Karsten .

RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2008, 33 (08) :1854-1867

[8] An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment [J].

Couture, Toby ;

Gagnon, Yves .

ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (02) :955-965

[9] Ten years of renewable electricity policies in Spain: An analysis of successive feed-in tariff reforms [J].

del Rio Gonzalez, Pablo .

ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (08) :2917-2929

[10]

DIMITROVSKI A, EPNES WORKSH MAYAG 2

← 1 2 3 4 →