The Financial Impact of Robotic Technology for Partial and Radical Nephrectomy

被引:37
|
作者
Kim, Na Young [1 ]
Yoo, Young-Chul [1 ]
Park, HeeJoon [1 ]
Choi, Young Deuk [2 ]
Kim, Chan Yun [3 ]
Bai, Sun Joon [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Anesthesia & Pain Res Inst, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Urol Sci Inst, Dept Urol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Vis Res, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
PERIOPERATIVE VISUAL-LOSS; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; STEEP TRENDELENBURG; BLOOD-PRESSURE; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; SURGERY; PREMEDICATION; ANESTHESIA; INTUBATION; CLONIDINE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2014.0559
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We sought to evaluate the financial impact of robotic technology for partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in the state of Maryland. Methods: The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) documents all acute care hospital charges data. This database was queried for patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted RN and PN from 2008 to 2012. Total hospital charge, subcharge, and length of stay (LOS) were analyzed separately for RN and PN. Results: Overall, 2834 patients were identified. Of those, 282 were laparoscopic PN (LPN), 1078 robot-assisted PN (RPN), 1098 laparoscopic RN (LRN), and 376 robot-assisted RN (RRN). For PN, the total hospital charge was $19,062 for LPN and $18,255 for RPN (P=0.138), with a charge savings of $807 per case in favor of robotics. For RN, the total hospital charge was $23,391 for RRN and $18,280 for LRN (P=0.004), with a charge premium of $5111 for robotic cases. LOS was shorter for RPN compared with LPN (2.51 vs 2.99 days, P<0.0001) and for RRN compared with LRN (3.52 vs 3.98, P=0.0498). Conclusions: RPN is associated with lower hospital charges than LPN, while RRN is associated with higher hospital charges than LRN. Savings for RPN are driven by decreased room and board charge, while the premium for RRN is driven by higher operating room and supply charges. Because RRN use is increasing, the financial implications of RRN use for routine cases warrants further study.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 316
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with large renal masses
    Veccia, Alessandro
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Minervini, Andrea
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Challacombe, Benjamin
    Perdona, Sisto
    Porter, James
    Zhang, Chao
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Sundaram, Chandru P.
    Cacciamani, Giovanni
    Aron, Monish
    Anele, Uzoma
    Hampton, Lance J.
    Simeone, Claudio
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Bradshawh, Aaron
    Mari, Andrea
    Campi, Riccardo
    Carini, Marco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Gallucci, Michele
    Jacobsohn, Ken
    Eun, Daniel
    Lau, Clayton
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Derweesh, Ithaar
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Autorino, Riccardo
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (01) : 99 - 108
  • [2] IMPACT OF TRANSITION TO EARLY UNCLAMPING IN ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Shah, Ketul
    Mulligan, Daniel
    Abaza, Ronney
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A185 - A186
  • [3] Radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy
    Eich, Caroline
    Giessing, Markus
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2020, 51 (05) : 441 - 449
  • [4] The Impact of Obesity in Patients Undergoing Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
    Rosen, Daniel C.
    Kannappan, Muthumeena
    Kim, Yong
    Paulucci, David J.
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Abaza, Ronney
    Eun, Daniel D.
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Porter, James R.
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2019, 33 (06) : 431 - 437
  • [5] THE IMPACT OF OBESITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Rosen, Daniel C.
    Kannappan, Muthumeena
    Kim, Yong
    Paulucci, David J.
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Abaza, Ronney
    Eun, Daniel D.
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Porter, James
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E436 - E436
  • [6] PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY CONVERTING TO RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY: IMPACT OF PATIENT AND SURGICAL FACTORS
    Ashrafi, Akbar
    Mekhail, Peter
    Brandina, Ricardo
    Redrow, Grant
    Desai, Mihir
    Gill, Inderbir
    Aron, Monish
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E319 - E320
  • [7] Is robotic technology facilitating the minimally invasive approach to partial nephrectomy?
    Dev, Harveer S.
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Anderson, Christopher J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (05) : 760 - 768
  • [8] ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RECURRENT RENAL TUMORS (REDO ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY)
    Meilika, Kirolos
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Okhawere, Kennedy
    Dayal, Bheesham
    Ige, Olajukome
    Badani, Ketan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E92 - E93
  • [9] Combined Robotic Radical Prostatectomy and Robotic Radical Nephrectomy
    Lavery, Hugh J.
    Patel, Shiv
    Palese, Michael
    Kasabian, Nabet G.
    Gainsburg, Daniel M.
    Samadi, David B.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2010, 14 (04) : 603 - 607
  • [10] Combined Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy and Radical Prostatectomy
    Patel, Manish N.
    Eun, Daniel
    Menon, Mani
    Rogers, Craig G.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2009, 13 (02) : 229 - 232