The role of linguistic cues in bilingual negation processing

被引:7
|
作者
Coso, Bojana [1 ]
Bogunovic, Irena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rijeka, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Sveucilisna Avenija 4, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
[2] Univ Rijeka, Fac Maritime Studies, Dept Foreign Languages, Rijeka, Croatia
关键词
Negation processing; two-step model; linguistic cues; bilingualism; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1177/1367006917698840
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives: A vast body of research has dealt with negation processing. There are many differences between negations across languages, which could influence negation processing in bilingual speakers. However, bilingual negation processing has rarely been experimentally investigated. This study aims at exploring whether highly proficient Croatian-English bilinguals are able to adequately adopt English negations, and whether linguistic cues from both languages have similar effect on negation processing. Methodology: A sentence-picture verification task was used to investigate the processing of affirmative sentences, sentential and constituent negations, Croatian negative concord and English sentences with negated subject. Data and analysis: 2 (language) x 4 (sentence type) x 2 (congruency) ANOVA with repeated measures was used to analyze the data. Findings: The results showed that the effect of language was not significant, except in the case of constituent negations which were processed faster in English. There was a significant difference between the processing of affirmative and negative sentences, as affirmatives were processed faster than negatives in both languages. Constituent negations in both languages were processed slower compared with other types of negations. Originality: The results suggest that strong linguistic cues, such as word order and quantifiers, influence negation processing in both languages, resulting in differences between different types of negations. The results are discussed in the light of two existing models of negation and sentence processing. A new model, as a combination of these two models, is
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 36
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cognitive and Linguistic Processing in the Bilingual Mind
    Bialystok, Ellen
    Craik, Fergus I. M.
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 19 (01) : 19 - 23
  • [2] Cross-linguistic activation in bilingual sentence processing: The role of word class meaning
    Baten, Kristof
    Hofman, Fabrice
    Loeys, Tom
    BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2011, 14 (03) : 351 - 359
  • [3] Aphasia in a bilingual user of BSL and English: Effects of cross linguistic cues
    Woll, B
    Marshall, J
    Atkinson, J
    Thacker, A
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 71 - 72
  • [4] NEGATION - A LINGUISTIC VARIABLE
    EIFERMANN, RR
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1961, 18 (04) : 258 - 273
  • [5] Dynamic Neural Processing of Linguistic Cues Related to Death
    Liu, Xi
    Shi, Zhenhao
    Ma, Yina
    Qin, Jungang
    Han, Shihui
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06):
  • [6] AUDITORY AND LINGUISTIC PROCESSING OF CUES FOR PLACE OF ARTICULATION BY INFANTS
    EIMAS, PD
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (03): : 513 - 521
  • [7] Does source reliability moderate the survival processing effect? The role of linguistic markers as reliability cues
    Arslan, Burcu
    Goksun, Tilbe
    Akcay, Caglar
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2025, 53 (02) : 666 - 681
  • [8] Reading comprehension of monolingual and bilingual children in primary school: the role of linguistic abilities and phonological processing skills
    Novita, Shally
    Lockl, Kathrin
    Gnambs, Timo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (04) : 993 - 1013
  • [9] English words in Croatian: linguistic borrowing and bilingual language processing
    Bogunovic, Irena
    SUVREMENA LINGVISTIKA, 2023, 49 (96): : 251 - 280
  • [10] Reading comprehension of monolingual and bilingual children in primary school: the role of linguistic abilities and phonological processing skills
    Shally Novita
    Kathrin Lockl
    Timo Gnambs
    European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2022, 37 : 993 - 1013