共 9 条
- [1] Resisting the Long Arm of Criminal Antitrust Laws: Norris v The United States MODERN LAW REVIEW, 2009, 72 (02): : 272 - 295
- [2] BUT THAT WAS IN ANOTHER COUNTRY - THE EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF US ANTITRUST-LAWS IN THE UNITED-STATES-SUPREME-COURT INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY, 1994, 43 : 417 - 425
- [4] Pleas, plain language and precedent: Applicability of Rules 11(f) and 31(e) to criminal forfeiture provisions - United States v. Libretti, 116 S. Ct. 356 (1995) JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03): : 812 - 841
- [5] The Orwell Court: How the Supreme Court Recast History and Minimized the Role of the US Sentencing Guidelines to Justify Limiting the Impact of Johnson v. United States BUFFALO LAW REVIEW, 2018, 66 (05): : 1013 - 1070
- [6] US Ass'n of importers of textiles & apparel v. United States:: The impact of inconsistent domestic agency procedures governing textile-specific safeguard measures on the business operations of US importers CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2006, 55 (04): : 1169 - 1202
- [9] CRIMINAL LAW - COMPREHENSIVE DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL ACT OF 1970 - FEDERAL PRISONER WHO COMMITTED A NARCOTICS OFFENSE PRIOR TO ACTS EFFECTIVE DATE THUS BEING INELIGIBLE FOR JUDICIAL PAROLE CAN NOW BE CONSIDERED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PAROLE UNDER PROVISIONS OF ACT - UNITED STATES EX REL MARRERO V WARDEN, 483 F2D 656 (3D CIR 1973), CERT GRANTED, 414 US - (1974) GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 1974, 42 (03) : 676 - &