Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool

被引:104
|
作者
Phielix, Chris [1 ]
Prins, Frans J.
Kirschner, Paul A. [2 ]
Erkens, Gijsbert
Jaspers, Jos
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Res Ctr Learning Interact, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Open Univ Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Groupware; Peer assessment; Peer feedback; Reflection; Group performance; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; MANAGING WORK GROUPS; FACE GROUPS; HIGHER-EDUCATION; SELF-ASSESSMENT; VIRTUAL TEAMS; COMMUNICATION; METAANALYSIS; PARTICIPATION; VISUALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A peer feedback tool (Radar) and a reflection tool (Reflector) were used to enhance group performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Radar allows group members to assess themselves and their fellow group members on six traits related to social and cognitive behavior. Reflector stimulates group members to reflect on their past, present and future group functioning, stimulating them to set goals and formulate plans to improve their social and cognitive performance. The underlying assumption was that group performance would be positively influenced by making group members aware of how they, their peers and the whole group perceive their social and cognitive behavior in the group. Participants were 108 fourth-year high school students working in dyads, triads and groups of four on a collaborative writing task, with or without the tools. Results demonstrate that awareness stimulated by the peer feedback and reflection tools enhances group-process satisfaction and social performance of CSCL-groups. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1102
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection
    Phielix, Chris
    Prins, Frans J.
    Kirschner, Paul A.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2010, 26 (02) : 151 - 161
  • [2] Awareness of cognitive and social behaviour in a CSCL environment
    Kirschner, P. A.
    Kreijns, K.
    Phielix, C.
    Fransen, J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2015, 31 (01) : 59 - 77
  • [3] The effects of group awareness tools on student engagement with peer feedback in online collaborative writing environments
    Su, You
    Ren, Jing
    Song, Xiaohui
    INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 32 (05) : 1907 - 1923
  • [4] Effects of the physical and social environment on youth cognitive performance
    Meredith, Wesley J.
    Cardenas-Iniguez, Carlos
    Berman, Marc G.
    Rosenberg, Monica D.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2022, 64 (04)
  • [5] Effects of group awareness support in CSCL on students' learning performance: A three-level meta-analysis
    Chen, Dengkang
    Zhang, Yi
    Luo, Heng
    Zhu, Zhifang
    Ma, Jingsi
    Lin, Yuru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2024, 19 (01) : 97 - 129
  • [6] Using Group Awareness Tools to Enhance Students' Behavioral and Cognitive Engagement with Peer Feedback in Online Collaborative Essay Writing
    Ren, Jing
    Su, You
    Song, Xiaohui
    Guo, Haizhen
    30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION, ICCE 2022, VOL 1, 2022, : 537 - 542
  • [7] EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE FEEDBACK ON PERFORMANCE
    BALZER, WK
    DOHERTY, ME
    OCONNOR, R
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 106 (03) : 410 - 433
  • [8] Effects of group awareness support in CSCL on students’ learning performance: A three-level meta-analysis
    Dengkang Chen
    Yi Zhang
    Heng Luo
    Zhifang Zhu
    Jingsi Ma
    Yuru Lin
    International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2024, 19 : 97 - 129
  • [9] Effects of Videotaped Feedback in Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder
    Laposa, Judith M.
    Rector, Neil A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE THERAPY, 2014, 7 (04): : 360 - 372
  • [10] Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback
    Jingyan Lu
    Nancy Law
    Instructional Science, 2012, 40 : 257 - 275