The validity and reliability of the UIMS physician satisfaction survey

被引:0
|
作者
Smith, Brittni [1 ]
Dews, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Southfield Lathrup High Sch, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Many studies in the medical literature have described patient satisfaction and physician satisfaction as independent concepts, but the relationship between the two is not well studied. In order to address the research question, "What is the relationship between physician satisfaction and patient satisfaction," two surveys have been conducted by the University Internal Medicine Specialist group (UIMS) in the academic, urban, outpatient setting. The patient survey contained questions focusing on the satisfaction of patients. The physician survey focused on questions regarding the satisfaction of physicians with their practice. Before each survey could be conducted, we wanted to determine if each survey was valid and reliable. Good reliability and validity of these surveys would ensure that accurate conclusions are drawn from their results. A pre-existing, validated instrument, Group-Level Consumer Assessment Health Plan Study, (G-CAHPS)) was selected as the patient opinion survey. This report focuses on the validity and reliability of the physician opinion survey (POP) which was developed to suit the UIMS setting.
引用
收藏
页码:S16 / S17
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An evaluation of a patient satisfaction survey: validity and reliability
    Dufrene, RL
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2000, 23 (03) : 293 - 300
  • [2] Establishing reliability and validity of the Critical Care Family Satisfaction Survey
    Wasser, T
    Pasquale, MA
    Matchett, SC
    Bryan, Y
    Pasquale, M
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (01) : 192 - 196
  • [3] Validity and reliability of the Greek translation of the Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS)
    Tsounis A.
    Sarafis P.
    BMC Psychology, 6 (1)
  • [4] PHYSICIAN SATISFACTION WITH PATIENT ENCOUNTERS - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ENCOUNTER-SPECIFIC QUESTIONNAIRE
    SHORE, BE
    FRANKS, P
    MEDICAL CARE, 1986, 24 (07) : 580 - 589
  • [5] Examining the validity and reliability of the COMcareSS (Continuity of Midwifery Care Satisfaction Survey)
    Perriman, Noelyn
    Taylor, Jan
    Davis, Deborah Lee
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2024, 37 (04)
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the satisfaction module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey
    Demirdel, Senem
    Ulas, Kardem
    Celik, Seher Erol
    Karahan, Sevilay
    Topuz, Semra
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 46 (02) : 170 - 174
  • [7] Validity and reliability of the parent satisfaction questionnaire
    Stallard, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 35 : 311 - 318
  • [8] Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey
    Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn
    Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
    Dodek, Peter
    Heyland, Daren K.
    Chanayat, Panida
    Inchai, Juthamas
    Pothirat, Chaicharn
    Liwsrisakun, Chalerm
    Bumroongkit, Chaiwat
    Deesomchok, Athavuth
    Theerakittikul, Theerakorn
    Limsukon, Atikun
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 24 (10) : 946 - 954
  • [9] Physician Burnout Scale: A Reliability and Validity Study
    Selvi, Huseyin
    Toros, Turhan
    Ozdemir, Asena Ayca
    Bashan, Ibrahim
    PROGRESS IN NUTRITION, 2022, 24
  • [10] On the reliability and validity of physician ratings for vulvodynia and the discriminant validity of its subtypes
    Masheb, RM
    Lozano, C
    Richman, S
    Minkin, MJ
    Kerns, RD
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2004, 5 (04) : 349 - 358