Genotoxic assessment of oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine in drosophila wing spot test

被引:12
|
作者
Sarikaya, Rabia [1 ]
Yuksel, Mummer [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Dept Primary Educ, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkey
[2] 100 Yil Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, TR-06530 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Drosophila melanogaster; wing spot test; carbamazepine; oxcarbazepine; genotoxicity;
D O I
10.1016/j.fct.2008.06.089
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
In this study, different concentrations of two antiepileptic drugs, carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC), have been evaluated for genotoxicity in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster. The wing spot test detects different kinds of somatic mutations and allows detection of mitotic recombinations. Third-instar larvae trans-heterozygous for two genetic markers mwh and flr, were treated at different concentrations of the drugs. Oxcarbazepine exposure concentrations were 1.88, 3.75, 7.50 and 15 mu g/ml. Carbamazepine exposure concentrations were 5, 10, 20 and 40 mu g/ml. In addition, the observed mutations were classified according to size and type of mutation per wing. CBZ was genotoxic in terms of total mutations per wing in the highest two doses; the same was true for CXC in the highest three doses. Survival rates of flies used in the experiments were significantly lower than that of the control group showing both drugs to have toxic effects to Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Clone formation frequency for 105 cells was lower in OXC than CBZ. However this was lower than the critical genotoxicity frequency of 2.0. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3159 / 3162
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of the genotoxic potential of essential oil constituents by the Drosophila wing spot test
    Mademtzoglou, Despoina
    Pavlidou, Theodora
    Bazioti, Maria-Georgia
    Koutsonikou, Chrysoula
    Lioulia, Elisavet
    Akmoutsou, Paraskevi
    Drosopoulou, Elena
    Vokou, Despoina
    Mavragani-Tsipidou, Penelope
    FLAVOUR AND FRAGRANCE JOURNAL, 2013, 28 (03) : 188 - 194
  • [2] Assessment of genotoxic potential of two mycotoxins in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster
    Gurbuzel, Mehmet
    Uysal, Handan
    Kizilet, Halit
    TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2015, 31 (03) : 261 - 267
  • [3] Genotoxic evaluation of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in the Drosophila wing spot test
    Mehmet Gürbüzel
    Ugur Karaca
    Nermin Karayilan
    Cytotechnology, 2016, 68 : 979 - 986
  • [4] Genotoxic evaluation of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in the Drosophila wing spot test
    Gurbuzel, Mehmet
    Karaca, Ugur
    Karayilan, Nermin
    CYTOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 68 (04) : 979 - 986
  • [5] Genotoxic evaluation of two mercury compounds in the Drosophila wing spot test
    Carmona, Erico R.
    Kossatz, Elk
    Creus, Amadeu
    Marcos, Ricardo
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2008, 70 (10) : 1910 - 1914
  • [6] Determination of the genotoxic effects of various dioxins by Drosophila wing spot test
    Colak, Deniz Altun
    Uysal, Handan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (09) : 640 - 645
  • [7] Genotoxic evaluation of two oral antidiabetic agents in the Drosophila wing spot test
    Guerbuezel, Mehmet
    Capoglu, Ilyas
    Kizilet, Halit
    Halici, Zekai
    Ozcicek, Fatih
    Demirtas, Levent
    TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2014, 30 (04) : 376 - 383
  • [8] Genotoxic effects of eugenol, isoeugenol and safrole in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster
    Munerato, MC
    Sinigaglia, M
    Reguly, ML
    de Andrade, HHR
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2005, 582 (1-2) : 87 - 94
  • [9] GENOTOXIC ACTIVITY OF 3 THIOCARBAMATE HERBICIDES IN THE DROSOPHILA WING SPOT-TEST
    SURJAN, A
    PINTER, A
    TOROK, G
    CSIK, M
    KELECSENYI, Z
    KOCSIS, Z
    MUTATION RESEARCH, 1992, 271 (02): : 180 - 181
  • [10] Drosophila wing-spot test for genotoxic assessment of pollutants in water samples from urban and industrial origin
    do Amaral, VS
    da Silva, RM
    Reguly, ML
    de Andrade, HHR
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2005, 583 (01) : 67 - 74