Fetal Growth Biometry as Predictors of Shoulder Dystocia in a Low-Risk Obstetrical Population

被引:2
|
作者
Newman, Roger B. [1 ]
Stevens, Danielle R. [2 ]
Hunt, Kelly J. [2 ]
Grobman, William A. [3 ]
Owen, John [4 ]
Sciscione, Anthony [5 ]
Wapner, Ronald J. [6 ]
Skupski, Daniel [7 ]
Chien, Edward K. [8 ]
Wing, Deborah A. [9 ,10 ]
Ranzini, Angela C. [8 ,11 ]
Porto, Manuel [9 ]
Grantz, Katherine L. [12 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[5] Christiana Hlth Care Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Wilmington, DE USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[7] New York Presbyterian Queens, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Flushing, NY USA
[8] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metro Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[9] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Orange, CA USA
[10] Fountain Valley Reg Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fountain Valley, CA USA
[11] St Peters Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[12] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Div Intramural Populat Hlth Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
fetal biometrics; fetal growth ultrasound; prediction of shoulder dystocia; asymmetric fetal growth; BRACHIAL-PLEXUS PALSY; CESAREAN DELIVERY; MACROSOMIA; WEIGHT; ASYMMETRY; FETUS; SINGLETONS; INFANTS; WOMEN; LABOR;
D O I
10.1055/a-1787-6991
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to evaluate fetal biometrics as predictors of shoulder dystocia (SD) in a low-risk obstetrical population. Study Design Participants were enrolled as part of a U.S.-based prospective cohort study of fetal growth in low-risk singleton gestations ( n = 2,802). Eligible women had liveborn singletons >= 2,500 g delivered vaginally. Sociodemographic, anthropometric, and pregnancy outcome data were abstracted by research staff. The diagnosis of SD was based on the recorded clinical impression of the delivering physician. Simple logistic regression models were used to examine associations between fetal biometrics and SD. Fetal biometric cut points, selected by Youden's J and clinical determination, were identified to optimize predictive capability. A final model for SD prediction was constructed using backward selection. Our dataset was randomly divided into training (60%) and test (40%) datasets for model building and internal validation. Results A total of 1,691 women (98.7%) had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, while 23 (1.3%) experienced SD. There were no differences in sociodemographic or maternal anthropometrics between groups. Epidural anesthesia use was significantly more common (100 vs. 82.4%; p = 0.03) among women who experienced SD compared with those who did not. Amniotic fluid maximal vertical pocket was also significantly greater among SD cases (5.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.1 +/- 1.5 cm; odds ratio = 1.32 [95% confidence interval: 1.03,1.69]). Several fetal biometric measures were significantly associated with SD when dichotomized based on clinically selected cut-off points. A final prediction model was internally valid with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.99). At a model probability of 1%, sensitivity (71.4%), specificity (77.5%), positive (3.5%), and negative predictive values (99.6%) did not indicate the ability of the model to predict SD in a clinically meaningful way. Conclusion Other than epidural anesthesia use, neither sociodemographic nor maternal anthropometrics were significantly associated with SD in this low-risk population. Both individually and in combination, fetal biometrics had limited ability to predict SD and lack clinical usefulness.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 901
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SHOULDER DYSTOCIA - A FETAL-PHYSICIAN RISK
    GROSS, TL
    SOKOL, RJ
    WILLIAMS, T
    THOMPSON, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 156 (06) : 1408 - 1418
  • [2] LONGITUDINAL-STUDY OF FETAL GROWTH IN SUBGROUPS OF A LOW-RISK POPULATION
    MONGELLI, M
    GARDOSI, J
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 6 (05) : 340 - 344
  • [3] Fetal size and growth velocity in the prediction of shoulder dystocia in a glucose impaired population
    Kernaghan, Dawn
    Farrell, Tom
    Ola, Bola
    Owen, Philip
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 144 (02) : 185 - 186
  • [4] FETAL MOVEMENT AND FETAL-OUTCOME IN A LOW-RISK POPULATION
    FISCHER, S
    FULLERTON, JT
    TREZISE, L
    JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1981, 26 (01): : 24 - 30
  • [5] Intrauterine fetal death and risk of shoulder dystocia at delivery
    Larsen, Sandra
    Dobbin, Joanna
    McCallion, Oliver
    Eskild, Anne
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (12) : 1345 - 1351
  • [6] Potential Risk Factors for Predicting Fetal Shoulder Dystocia
    Koese, Caner
    Baran, Gonca Karatas
    Ozbek, Ibrahim Mert
    Ergani, Seval Yilmaz
    Varli, Erol Nadi
    Karadeniz, Rahmi Sinan
    Ustun, Yaprak Engin
    JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY, 2025, 41 (01) : 45 - 55
  • [7] Shoulder dystocia: Are historic risk factors reliable predictors?
    Ouzounian, JG
    Gherman, RB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (06) : 1933 - 1935
  • [8] Fetal growth velocity in diabetics and the risk for shoulder dystocia: a case-control study
    Mourad, Mirella
    Friedman, Alexander M.
    Ajemian, Barouyr
    Ferleger, Samantha
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Zork, Noelia
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (12): : 1978 - 1982
  • [9] Increasing Fetal Growth Velocity Increases the Risk of Shoulder Dystocia Among Nonmacrosomic Fetuses
    Macdonald, T.
    Hui, L.
    Robinson, A.
    Dane, K.
    Middleton, A.
    Tong, S.
    Walker, S.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 : 10 - 10
  • [10] Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population
    Sander Galjaard
    Lieveke Ameye
    Christoph C. Lees
    Anne Pexsters
    Tom Bourne
    Dirk Timmerman
    Roland Devlieger
    Biology of Sex Differences, 10