Differences between field-monitored and laboratory-measured soil moisture characteristics

被引:19
|
作者
Iiyama, Ippei [1 ]
机构
[1] Utsunomiya Univ, Fac Agr, Mine 350, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 3218505, Japan
关键词
field soil moisture characteristics; soil moisture hysteresis; plant available water; soil pore structure; WATER-RETENTION; HYDRAULIC FUNCTIONS; CALIBRATION; SUCTION; CURVES; PROBE;
D O I
10.1080/00380768.2016.1242367
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
A soil water retention curve (SWRC) is usually measured in a laboratory (lab SWRC), and is used to analyze in-situ soil moisture conditions. However, it is rarely verified whether and how a lab SWRC is in agreement with its equivalent relation between matric potential (h) and volumetric water content (theta) in a natural field (in-situ SWRC). In addition, most SWRCs show moisture hysteresis through which the drying process gives a larger theta at a given h than the wetting process, while an in-situ SWRC must be produced through the cycles of drying and wetting in the field. Thus, it can be hypothesized that an in-situ SWRC shows a lower value of theta than a lab SWRC for any h that the soil layer ordinarily experiences. To give experimental proofs for this hypothesis, this study aimed at quantifying seasonal behaviors of in-situ SWRCs and at comparing them with their corresponding lab SWRCs. To obtain a series of in-situ SWRCs, the h and theta were coincidently monitored at four points with three depths each in a meadow for 2.5 years using tensiometers and a capacitance-type soil moisture sensing system. As the equivalent to the in-situ SWRCs, the lab SWRCs were also measured. The in-situ SWRCs tended to have roughly 10% smaller theta than the lab SWRCs for the series of h observed in the study site, suggesting that an in-situ SWRC can hardly be reproduced by a lab SWRC only. In addition, when the driest condition in the recent 3 years was exerted on the study site, some in-situ SWRCs shifted along the theta axis on the theta(h) charts, suggesting that the most dried condition had changed the soil moisture regime of these soil layers, resulting in the reduction of monthly or annual means of soil water content in the field. Since the shifts of the in-situ SWRCs were accompanied by the increases in both the gradients 'd theta/dh' and the variation of measured h, it was implied that an extraordinary drying of a soil layer promotes the development of soil pore structure or an increase in the fraction of plant available water.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 422
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON OF FIELD-MONITORED AND NUMERICALLY PREDICTED MOISTURE MOVEMENT IN UNSATURATED SOIL
    THOMAS, HR
    REES, SW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 1991, 15 (06) : 417 - 431
  • [2] Field-monitored variations of soil moisture and matric suction in a saprolite slope
    Li, AG
    Yue, ZQ
    Tham, LG
    Lee, CF
    Law, KT
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [3] EXTENSION OF LABORATORY-MEASURED SOIL SPECTRA TO FIELD CONDITIONS
    STONER, ER
    BAUMGARDNER, MF
    WEISMILLER, RA
    BIEHL, LL
    ROBINSON, BF
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1980, 44 (03) : 572 - 574
  • [4] Correcting laboratory-measured moisture retention data for gravels
    Khaleel, R
    Relyea, JF
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1997, 33 (08) : 1875 - 1878
  • [5] Correcting laboratory-measured moisture retention data for gravels
    Khaleel, R.
    Relyea, J.F.
    Water Resources Research, 1997, 33 (08): : 1875 - 1878
  • [6] COMPARISON OF FIELD-MEASURED AND LABORATORY-MEASURED AND PREDICTED HYDRAULIC-PROPERTIES OF A SOIL WITH MACROPORES
    FIELD, JA
    PARKER, JC
    POWELL, NL
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1984, 138 (06) : 385 - 396
  • [7] FIELD-MEASURED LIMITS OF SOIL-WATER AVAILABILITY AS RELATED TO LABORATORY-MEASURED PROPERTIES
    RATLIFF, LF
    RITCHIE, JT
    CASSEL, DK
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1983, 47 (04) : 770 - 775
  • [8] Evaluation of laboratory-measured soil properties as indicators of soil physical quality
    Moebius, Bianca N.
    van Es, Harold M.
    Schindelbeck, Rohert R.
    Idowu, Omololu J.
    Clune, Daniel J.
    Thies, Janice E.
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2007, 172 (11) : 895 - 912
  • [9] Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior
    Chabris, Christopher F.
    Laibson, David
    Morris, Carrie L.
    Schuldt, Jonathon P.
    Taubinsky, Dmitry
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2008, 37 (2-3) : 237 - 269
  • [10] Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior
    Christopher F. Chabris
    David Laibson
    Carrie L. Morris
    Jonathon P. Schuldt
    Dmitry Taubinsky
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2008, 37 : 237 - 269