In order to optimize a freeze-drying cycle, information regarding the heat transfer characteristics of the container system is imperative. Two most recently developed tubing (TopLyo (TM)) and molded (EasyLyo (TM)) vial designs were compared with a standard serum tubing and molded vial, a polymer vial (TopPac (TM)), and an amber molded EasyLyo (TM). In addition, the impact of methodology on the determination of reliable vial heat transfer coefficient (K-v) data is examined in detail. All K(v)s were gravimetrically determined by sublimation tests with pure water at 50, 100, 200, and 400 mTorr. In contrast to the traditional assumption that molded vials exhibit inefficient heat transfer characteristics, these vials showed a very similar performance compared with their serum tubing counterparts in the relevant pressure range for freeze-drying. At 100 mTorr, the TopLyo (TM) center vials show only 4% higher Kv values than the EasyLyo (TM) center vials. All glass vials outmatch the polymer vial in terms of heat transfer, up to 30% elevated heat transfer for the TopLyo (TM) center vials at 400 mTorr. Sublimation tests have demonstrated to be a valuable tool to investigate the heat transfer characteristics of vials, but results are dependent on methodology. New developments in molded vial manufacturing lead to improved heat transfer performance. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 101:11891201, 2012