An insight to calculate soil conservation service

被引:8
|
作者
Lu, Shaojuan [1 ]
Duan, Xingwu [1 ]
Wei, Shengzhao [1 ]
Lin, Honghong [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Univ, Inst Int Rivers & Ecosecur, Kunming 650091, Peoples R China
关键词
Soil conservation service; Soil erosion; Cropland; Barren land; Algorithm; LAND-USE CHANGE; WATER CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SPATIAL-PATTERNS; EROSION CONTROL; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CROP YIELD; CHINA; IMPACTS; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.geosus.2022.08.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Quantifying soil conservation service is critical for sustainable land management. However, the traditional algo-rithm includes a gap between barren land and real soil erosion (BSERef), and its paradox is that a mass of barren land rarely exists in ecologically adaptable areas with fertile soils, which might overestimate soil conservation service. This study suggests a practical algorithm to effectively evaluate soil conservation service of different ecosystems. We propose a new algorithm based on the difference between cropland without control practices and real soil erosion (CSERef), which is compared with the BSERef algorithm. Our results show that: (1) a nearly five times smaller mean soil conservation amount of cropland occurred in the CSERef algorithm (3.76 x10 6 t & BULL;yr-1 ) than in the BSERef algorithm (20.04 x10 6 tyr-1); (2) land use has higher explanatory power for the spatial dif-ferentiation of soil conservation rate in the CSERef algorithm (15.93% -46.34%) than in the BSERef algorithm (5.95% -44.49%). Our results demonstrate that the BSERef algorithm overestimates the soil conservation service of cropland in ecologically adaptable areas, whereas the CSERef algorithm can effectively assess the influence of land use change induced by anthropogenic activities on soil conservation service. Furthermore, we develop an assessment framework in terms of land use classification system following the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The framework considers that for water bodies, there is no soil conservation service; for non-ecologically adaptable ar-eas (unused land) with vast barren lands and vegetation cover below 5%, the BSERef algorithm is recommended; the CSERef algorithm is suggested to use in ecologically adaptable areas (including woodland, grassland, crop-land and construction land). This assessment framework can provide scientific assistance for decision-makers to formulate strategies for sustainable land management.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条