A Pilot Study on the Randomization of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in High-Risk Trauma Patients

被引:45
|
作者
Rajasekhar, Anita [2 ]
Lottenberg, Lawrence [1 ]
Lottenberg, Richard [2 ]
Feezor, Robert J. [1 ]
Armen, Scott B. [3 ]
Liu, Huazhi [1 ]
Efron, Philip A. [1 ]
Crowther, Mark [4 ]
Ang, Darwin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Med, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Penn State Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Hershey, PA USA
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Inferior vena cava filters; Venous thromboembolism; Trauma; Pulmonary embolism; Prophylaxis; Prevention; Randomized controlled trial; Pilot feasibility study; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; PREVENTION; PREVALENCE; INSERTION;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e318226ece1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Placement of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters (pIVCFs) for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk trauma patients (HRTPs) are widely practiced despite the lack of Level I data supporting this use. We report the 2-year interim analysis of the Filters in Trauma pilot study. Methods: This is a single institution, prospective randomized controlled pilot feasibility study in a Level I trauma center. HRTPs were identified for pIVCF placement by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma guidelines. From November 2008 to November 2010, HRTPs were enrolled and randomized to either pIVCF or no pIVCF. All patients received pharmacologic prophylaxis when safe. Primary outcomes included feasibility objectives and secondary outcomes were incidence of PE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and death. Results: Thirty-four of 38 enrolled patients were eligible for analysis. The baseline sociodemographic characteristics were balanced between the both groups. Results of the feasibility objectives included: time from admission to enrollment (mean, 47.4 hours +/- 22.0 hours), time from enrollment to randomization (mean, 4.8 hours +/- 9.1 hours), time from randomization to IVCF placement (mean, 16.9 hours +/- 9.2 hours), adherence to weekly compression ultrasound within first month (IVCF group = 44.4%; non-IVCF group = 62.5%), and 1-month clinical follow-up (IVCF group = 83.3%; non-IVCF group = 100%). At 6-month follow-up, one PE in the nonfilter group and one DVT in the filter group had occurred. One non-PE-related death occurred in the filter group. Barriers to enrollment included inability to obtain informed consent due to patient refusal or no next of kin identified and delayed notification of eligibility status. Conclusion: Our pilot study demonstrates for the first time that a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of pIVCFs in trauma patients is feasible. This pilot data will be used to inform the design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial to determine the incidence of PE and DVT in HRTPs receiving pIVCFs versus no pIVCF.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 328
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Pilot Study on the Randomization of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in High-Risk Trauma Patients DISCUSSION
    Sing, Ronald
    Rajasekhar, Anita
    Alarcon, Louis
    Sise, Michael
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 71 (02): : 328 - 329
  • [2] The role of ultrasonography and inferior vena cava filter placement in high-risk trauma patients
    Headrick, JR
    Barker, DE
    Pate, LM
    Horne, K
    Russell, WL
    Burns, RP
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 1997, 63 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [3] The role of ultrasonography and inferior vena cava filter placement in high-risk trauma patients - Discussion
    Kearney, P
    Headrick, JR
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 1997, 63 (01) : 8 - 8
  • [4] Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism without Contraindication to Anticoagulation
    Parris, Ritika S.
    Carbo, Alexander R.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 13 (10) : 719 - 721
  • [5] COSTS OF INFERIOR VENA CAVA FILTER PLACEMENT FOR MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES WITH ACUTE VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM
    Sridharan, N.
    Williams, A.
    Chaer, R.
    Rojanasarot, S.
    Anderson, N.
    Wifler, W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S85 - S85
  • [6] Outcomes after inferior vena cava filter placement in cancer patients hospitalized for acute venous thromboembolism
    Wun, T.
    Brunson, A.
    Ho, G.
    White, R. H.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2014, 133 : S210 - S210
  • [7] Anticoagulation or inferior vena cava filter placement for patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage developing venous thromboembolism?
    Kelly, J
    Hunt, BJ
    Lewis, RR
    Rudd, A
    STROKE, 2003, 34 (12) : 2999 - 3005
  • [8] Money well spent? A cost and utilization analysis of prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement in high-risk trauma patients
    Carlin, Margo Nicole
    Daneshpajouh, Alireza
    Catino, Joseph
    Bukur, Marko
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 220 : 105 - 111
  • [9] Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in High-Risk Pediatric Trauma Patients
    Witte, Amanda B.
    Van Arendonk, Kyle
    Bergner, Carisa
    Bantchev, Martin
    Falcone, Richard A.
    Moody, Suzanne
    Hartman, Heather A.
    Evans, Emily
    Thakkar, Rajan
    Patterson, Kelli N.
    Minneci, Peter C.
    Mak, Grace Z.
    Slidell, Mark B.
    Johnson, MacKenton
    Landman, Matthew P.
    Markel, Troy A.
    Leys, Charles M.
    Stafford, Linda Cherney
    Draper, Jessica
    Foley, David S.
    Downard, Cynthia
    Skaggs, Tracy M.
    Lal, Dave R.
    Gourlay, David
    Ehrlich, Peter F.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2024, 159 (10) : 1149 - 1156
  • [10] Inferior vena cava filter thrombo-prophylaxis in high-risk twin pregnancy
    Opara, E.
    Gile, J.
    Zaidi, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2007, 98 (01) : 62 - 63