My primary concern in this article is the connection between virtue epistemology and evidentialism. This possible connection is analyzed upon, firstly, the example of the intellectual virtue of wisdom, and, secondly, the historical case - Thomas Aquinas' ap-proach to virtue of wisdom as an intellectual disposition (habi-tus). I argue that it is possible to offer such an interpretation of 'intellectual virtue' that aligns with the peripatetic tradition broadly understood (to which the epistemology of virtues as-cends), and on the basis of which an evidentialist theory of justifi-cation is offered. In the first part of the paper, I briefly present the main interpretations of virtue epistemology and evidentialism in the light of externalism/internalism debate. In the second part I discuss Aquinas' understanding of intellectual virtue as a disposi-tion (habitus). The main concern here are virtues of theoretical habitus - wisdom and (scientific) knowledge. I show that habitus in this case is understood in two ways: as an ability, inherent to human beings, and as objective knowledge. Thus, there are two understandings of wisdom - as a virtue and knowledge (scientia). Finally, in the concluding parts of the paper, I outline possible ways of solving presented in the first part challenges to eviden-tialism and internalism.