Contested regional orders and institutional balancing in the Asia Pacific

被引:50
作者
He, Kai [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Polit Sci, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
关键词
ASEAN; BRICS; China; US hegemony; institutional balancing; EAST-ASIA; CHINA; DIPLOMACY; MATTER; RISE;
D O I
10.1057/ip.2014.46
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The rise of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) is gradually transforming the international system from a unipolar world toward multipolarity. China's ascent not only challenges US domination, but also intensifies the institutionalization of security in the Asia Pacific. On the basis of institutional balancing theory, I argue that (i) China's rise has led to a competition among different regional orders, that is, the US-led bilateralism versus ASEAN-centered and China-supported multilateralism. However, conflicts or wars are not inevitable since the contested regional orders can coexist in the Asia Pacific. (ii) The deepening economic interdependence has encouraged regional powers, including the United States, China and ASEAN, to rely on different institutional balancing strategies to pursue security after the Cold War.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 222
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism [J].
Acharya, A .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 58 (02) :239-275
[2]  
Alagappa Muthiah., 2003, Asian Security Order, P33
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, XINHUA NEWS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, EM AS REG
[5]  
ASEAN, 2002, DECL COND PART S CHI
[6]  
Bhadrakumar M., 2006, ASIAN TIMES 0418
[7]  
Bhagwati J, 2006, FINANCIAL TIMES
[8]   Asia's post-crisis regionalism: bringing the state back in, keeping the (United) States out [J].
Bowles, P .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2002, 9 (02) :244-270
[9]  
Bull Hedley., 1977, ANARCHICAL SOC STUDY
[10]   The Shangri-La Dialogue and the institutionalization of defence diplomacy in Asia [J].
Capie, David ;
Taylor, Brendan .
PACIFIC REVIEW, 2010, 23 (03) :359-376