Blockwise Granger Causality and Blockwise New Causality

被引:0
|
作者
Jia, Xinxin [1 ]
Hu, Sanqing [1 ]
Zhang, Jianhai [1 ]
Kong, Wanzeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
2015 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (ICACI) | 2015年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Multivariate blockwise Granger causality (BGC) is used to reflect causal interactions among blocks of multivariate time series. Especially, spectral BGC and conditional spectral BGC is used to disclose blockwise causal flow among different brain areas in variant frequencies. In this paper, we demonstrate that (i) BGC in time domain may not disclose true causality at all. (ii) Due to the use of the transfer function or its inverse matrix and partial information of the multivariate linear regression model, both of spectral BGC and conditional spectral BGC have shortcomings and/or limitations which may inevitably lead to misinterpretation results. We then in time and frequency domains develop two new multivariate causality methods for the multivariate linear regression model, called blockwise new causality (BNC) and spectral BNC respectively. By several examples we confirm that BNC measures are more reasonable and understandable than BGC or conditional BGC. Finally, for EEG data from an epilepsy patient we analyze event-related potential (ERP) causality and demonstrate that both of BGC and BNC methods show significant causality flow in frequency domain, but the spectral BNC method yields satisfactory and convincing result which is consistent with event-related time-frequency power spectrum activity. The spectral BGC method is shown to generate misleading results.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 425
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shortcomings/Limitations of Blockwise Granger Causality and Advances of Blockwise New Causality
    Hu, Sanqing
    Jia, Xinxin
    Zhang, Jianhai
    Kong, Wanzeng
    Cao, Yu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2016, 27 (12) : 2588 - 2601
  • [2] Granger causality between multiple interdependent neurobiological time series: Blockwise versus pairwise methods
    Wang, Xue
    Chen, Yonghong
    Bressler, Steven L.
    Ding, Mingzhou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 17 (02) : 71 - 78
  • [3] More discussions for granger causality and new causality measures
    Sanqing Hu
    Yu Cao
    Jianhai Zhang
    Wanzeng Kong
    Kun Yang
    Yanbin Zhang
    Xun Li
    Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2012, 6 : 33 - 42
  • [4] More discussions for granger causality and new causality measures
    Hu, Sanqing
    Cao, Yu
    Zhang, Jianhai
    Kong, Wanzeng
    Yang, Kun
    Zhang, Yanbin
    Li, Xun
    COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS, 2012, 6 (01) : 33 - 42
  • [5] Conditional Granger causality and partitioned Granger causality: differences and similarities
    Sheida Malekpour
    William A. Sethares
    Biological Cybernetics, 2015, 109 : 627 - 637
  • [6] Conditional Granger causality and partitioned Granger causality: differences and similarities
    Malekpour, Sheida
    Sethares, William A.
    BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2015, 109 (06) : 627 - 637
  • [7] A new method of nonlinear causality detection: Reservoir computing Granger causality
    Wang, Mingzhao
    Fu, Zuntao
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2022, 154
  • [8] Comparison Analysis: Granger Causality and New Causality and Their Applications to Motor Imagery
    Hu, Sanqing
    Wang, Hui
    Zhang, Jianhai
    Kong, Wanzeng
    Cao, Yu
    Kozma, Robert
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2016, 27 (07) : 1429 - 1444
  • [9] Multiscale Granger causality
    Faes, Luca
    Nollo, Giandomenico
    Stramaglia, Sebastiano
    Marinazzo, Daniele
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2017, 96 (04)
  • [10] Granger causality revisited
    Friston, Karl J.
    Bastos, Andre M.
    Oswal, Ashwini
    van Wijk, Bernadette
    Richter, Craig
    Litvak, Vladimir
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 101 : 796 - 808