Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Selecting and Shifting Motor of Automated Mechanical Transmission

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Guohui [1 ]
Xie, Hui [1 ]
Chen, Tao [1 ]
Ruan, Diwang [1 ]
Zhang, Ruichang [1 ]
Tong, Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Engines, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2018年 / 51卷 / 31期
关键词
automated mechanical transmission; shifting motor; extended state observer; active disturbance rejection control;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.10.134
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The control strategy of shifting actuators is the most crucial part in the development of automated mechanical transmission (AMT) system. To solve problems such as large workload of parameters tuning and worse disturbance-rejecting ability under traditional PID for selecting and shifting gear in present industry, a new strategy based on active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) was proposed. The extended state observer (ESO) was used to observe and compensate total disturbances in real time to achieve precise closed-loop control for shifting motor position. The Hardware-In-the-Loop (HIL) experiments show that the speed of selecting actuator moving to target position under ADRC is 14.3% faster than that of PID, and the position deviation of selecting actuator is 0.9mm under ADRC with an external disturbance of 1N.m added, which is 59.1% less than that under PID. And the target gear tracking test indicates that the total shifting time under ADRC can be reduced by 2.37% to 5.08% compared with PID. This strategy has better control accuracy and robustness under load mutation condition compared to traditional PID. (C) 2018, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 764
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Bearingless Induction Motor
    Bu, Wen-Shao
    Huang, Yong-Quan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATION CONTROL (ICEEAC 2017), 2017, 123 : 386 - 391
  • [2] Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Linear Induction Motor
    Alonge, F.
    Cirrincione, M.
    D'Ippolito, F.
    Pucci, M.
    Sferlazza, A.
    2016 IEEE ENERGY CONVERSION CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (ECCE), 2016,
  • [3] Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Linear Induction Motor
    Alonge, Francesco
    Cirrincione, Maurizio
    D'Ippolito, Filippo
    Pucci, Marcello
    Sferlazza, Antonino
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2017, 53 (05) : 4460 - 4471
  • [4] Integrated and intelligent shifting control of automated mechanical transmission
    Lei, Y.
    Li, Y.
    Ge, A.
    2001, SAE-China (23):
  • [5] MPC based active disturbance rejection control for automated steering control
    Suhail, Suhail Ahmad
    Bazaz, Mohammad Abid
    Hussain, Shoeb
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, 2021, 235 (12) : 3199 - 3206
  • [6] Asynchronous motor active disturbance rejection control based on vector control
    He H.-C.
    Sun L.
    Zhang Y.-F.
    Zhu Q.
    Dianji yu Kongzhi Xuebao/Electric Machines and Control, 2019, 23 (04): : 120 - 125
  • [7] Active Disturbance Rejection Control Applied to a DC Motor for Position Control
    Suhail, Suhail Ahmad
    Bazaz, Mohammad Abid
    Hussain, Shoeb
    PROCEEDINGS OF ICETIT 2019: EMERGING TRENDS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 605 : 437 - 448
  • [8] On the Active Disturbance Rejection Control of the Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
    Zurita-Bustamante, E. W.
    Sira-Ramirez, H.
    Linares-Flores, J.
    Ramirez-Cardenas, O. D.
    Contreras-Ordaz, M. A.
    Guerrero-Castellanos, J. F.
    2018 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE AT ILLINOIS (PECI), 2018,
  • [9] Active Disturbance Rejection Control for permanent magnetic toroidal motor
    Jia, Xin
    Liu, Xin
    2018 37TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2018, : 110 - 115
  • [10] Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Permanent Magnet Linear Motor
    Hu, Tao
    Xue, Wenchao
    Huang, Yi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2012, : 296 - 301