Incorporating ecological functions in conservation decision making

被引:24
|
作者
Decker, Emilia [1 ,2 ]
Linke, Simon [2 ]
Hermoso, Virgilio [2 ,3 ]
Geist, Juergen [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Ecol & Ecosyst Management, Aquat Syst Biol Unit, Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[2] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Ctr Tecnol Forestal Catalunya, Lleida, Spain
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2017年 / 7卷 / 20期
关键词
biodiversity; biological traits; MARXAN; systematic conservation planning; trophic level; INVASIVE SPECIES REMOVAL; CONNECTIVITY; BIODIVERSITY; PRIORITIES; LANDSCAPE; DYNAMICS; NETWORK; TRAITS;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.3353
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Systematic conservation planning has become a standard approach globally, but prioritization of conservation efforts hardly considers species traits in decision making. This can be important for species persistence and thus adequacy of the conservation plan. Here, we developed and validated a novel approach of incorporating trophic information into a systematic conservation planning framework. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach using fish data from Europe's second largest river, the Danube. Our results show that adding trophic information leads to a different spatial configuration of priority areas at no additional cost. This can enhance identification of priority refugia for species in the lower position of the trophic web while simultaneously identifying areas that represent a more diverse species pool. Our methodological approach to incorporating species traits into systematic conservation planning is generally applicable, irrespective of realm, geographical area, and species composition and can potentially lead to more adequate conservation plans.
引用
收藏
页码:8273 / 8281
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Incorporating asymmetric connectivity into spatial decision making for conservation
    Beger, Maria
    Linke, Simon
    Watts, Matt
    Game, Eddie
    Treml, Eric
    Ball, Ian
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (05): : 359 - 368
  • [2] Integration of ecological-biological thresholds in conservation decision making
    Mavrommati, Georgia
    Bithas, Kostas
    Borsuk, Mark E.
    Howarth, Richard B.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (06) : 1173 - 1181
  • [3] Decision making in livestock conservation
    Simianer, H
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 53 (04) : 559 - 572
  • [4] Incorporating collective functions to multicriteria disaggregation–aggregation approaches for small group decision making
    Athanasios Spyridakos
    Denis Yannacopoulos
    Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 227 : 119 - 136
  • [5] Incorporating science into decision-making
    Karl, HA
    Turner, CE
    SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5624) : 1370 - 1370
  • [6] Optimising Seagrass Conservation for Ecological Functions
    Christopher J. Henderson
    Tim Stevens
    Shing Y. Lee
    Ben L. Gilby
    Thomas A. Schlacher
    Rod M. Connolly
    Jan Warnken
    Paul S. Maxwell
    Andrew D. Olds
    Ecosystems, 2019, 22 : 1368 - 1380
  • [7] Optimising Seagrass Conservation for Ecological Functions
    Henderson, Christopher J.
    Stevens, Tim
    Lee, Shing Y.
    Gilby, Ben L.
    Schlacher, Thomas A.
    Connolly, Rod M.
    Warnken, Jan
    Maxwell, Paul S.
    Olds, Andrew D.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 22 (06) : 1368 - 1380
  • [8] Ecological Function Analysis: Incorporating Species Roles into Conservation
    Brodie, Jedediah F.
    Redford, Kent H.
    Doak, Daniel F.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2018, 33 (11) : 840 - 850
  • [9] Incorporating social-ecological complexities into conservation policy
    Brehony, Peadar
    Tyrrell, Peter
    Kamanga, John
    Waruingi, Lucy
    Kaelo, Dickson
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 248
  • [10] Conservation Decision-Making in Palau: An Example of the Parallel Working of Scientific and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
    Pilbeam, Victoria
    van Kerkhoff, Lorrae
    Weir, Tony
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 64 (05) : 564 - 579