Is the Routine Use of Drainage After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Justified? A Randomized Trial

被引:36
|
作者
Georgiou, Chrysanthos [1 ]
Demetriou, Nicoleta [2 ]
Pallaris, Theodoros [2 ]
Theodosopoulos, Theodosis [3 ]
Katsouyanni, Klea [4 ]
Polymeneas, Georgios [3 ]
机构
[1] Nicosia Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, CY-2029 Nicosia, Cyprus
[2] Larnaca Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Larnax, Cyprus
[3] Aretaie Hosp, Athens Med Sch, Dept Surg 2, Athens, Greece
[4] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Hyg Epidemiol & Med Stat, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
SURGICAL DRAINAGE;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2010.0003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for the surgical treatment of cholelithiasis. However, the use of drainage after elective LC in literature remains controversial. Methods: A randomized study was performed in Larnaka General Hospital. The purpose of the study was to evaluate drainage of the gallbladder bed after elective LC. One hundred sixteen patients were randomly allocated in two groups, sustained an uneventful LC, and were included in the study after an informed consent was obtained. Sixty-three patients were included in drainage group (YD) and 53 patients in nondrainage group (ND). Drain tubes, made of polyethylene, were placed at the end of the procedure in the patients of YD group. Postoperative pain was assessed using two scales: a 10-point visual analog scale and a 5-point verbal response scale. The two groups were evaluated and compared regarding postoperative pain, the time needed for surgery, length of postoperative hospital stay, the postoperative collection of fluid in the subhepatic space, and the incidence of postoperative complications. Chi-square and t-tests were used to evaluate the data, and statistical significance was established at P < .05. Results: The mean operative time in YD patients was 6.9 minutes longer compared with ND patients (P = .056). The postoperative pain was higher in the YD group by more than one point on the average in the visual analog scale both at 6 and 24 hours (P = .01 and < .001, respectively). When measured with the verbal response scale, the difference in the reported pain was very significant at 24 hours (mean level for YD 1.24 and for ND 0.75). The proportion of patients staying in hospital for > 2 days was higher in the YD group: 28.6% of the patients versus 13.2% in the ND group (P = .05). Subhepatic fluid was more often observed in the YD group (47% versus 34% in the ND), but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in the rate of wound infections, shoulder pain, nausea, vomiting, and respiratory infections between the two groups. Conclusions: Our results indicate that routine drainage of gallbladder bed after elective LC may not be justified. Drainage causes more postoperative pain, prolongs the operative time and hospital stay, increases the occurrence of fluid in the subhepatic space, and does not protect from other complications.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 123
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Routine Sub-hepatic Drainage versus No Drainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Open, Randomized, Clinical Trial
    Muhammad Shamim
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2013, 75 : 22 - 27
  • [2] Routine Sub-hepatic Drainage versus No Drainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Open, Randomized, Clinical Trial
    Shamim, Muhammad
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 75 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [3] Is there a role for drain use in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A controlled randomized trial
    Tzovaras, George
    Liakou, Paraskevi
    Fafoulakis, Frank
    Baloyiannis, Ioannis
    Zacharoulis, Dimitris
    Hatzitheofilou, Constantine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 197 (06): : 759 - 763
  • [4] Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial
    Picchio, Marcello
    De Angelis, Francesco
    Zazza, Settimio
    Di Filippo, Annalisa
    Mancini, Raffaello
    Pattaro, Giada
    Stipa, Francesco
    Adisa, Adewale Oluseye
    Marino, Giuseppe
    Spaziani, Erasmo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (10): : 2817 - 2822
  • [5] Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial
    Marcello Picchio
    Francesco De Angelis
    Settimio Zazza
    Annalisa Di Filippo
    Raffaello Mancini
    Giada Pattaro
    Francesco Stipa
    Adewale Oluseye Adisa
    Giuseppe Marino
    Erasmo Spaziani
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 2817 - 2822
  • [6] ROUTINE DRAINAGE FOLLOWING UNCOMPLICATED, ELECTIVE CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY
    FORSTER, R
    SCHNABEL, M
    KRAHL, M
    LINDLAR, R
    ROTHMUND, M
    CHIRURG, 1992, 63 (07): : 558 - 562
  • [7] Effectiveness of no drainage after elective day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy, even with intraoperative gallbladder perforation: a randomized controlled trial
    Huanbing Zhu
    Daren Liu
    Donger Zhou
    Jinhong Wu
    Yuanquan Yu
    Yun Jin
    Dan Ye
    Chao Ding
    Xiaoxiao Zhang
    Bingying Huang
    Shuyou Peng
    Jiangtao Li
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [8] Effectiveness of no drainage after elective day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy, even with intraoperative gallbladder perforation: a randomized controlled trial
    Zhu, Huanbing
    Liu, Daren
    Zhou, Donger
    Wu, Jinhong
    Yu, Yuanquan
    Jin, Yun
    Ye, Dan
    Ding, Chao
    Zhang, Xiaoxiao
    Huang, Bingying
    Peng, Shuyou
    Li, Jiangtao
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2023, 408 (01)
  • [9] Necessity of the routine abdominal drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)
    Szpaszkij, L.
    Vanca, T.
    Berenyi, B.
    Dudas, I.
    Zsirka-Klein, A.
    Lukovich, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : S75 - S75
  • [10] Routine histopathology of gallbladder after elective cholecystectomy for gallstones: waste of resources or a justified act?
    Faisal G Siddiqui
    Ahmer A Memon
    Arshad H Abro
    Nazeer A Sasoli
    Lubna Ahmad
    BMC Surgery, 13