An integrated model of social psychological and personality psychological perspectives on personality and wellbeing

被引:12
|
作者
Schimmack, Ulrich [1 ]
Kim, Hyunji [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Scarborough, ON, Canada
关键词
Positive Illusions; Halo; Evaluative bias; Personality; Big Five; Wellbeing; Multi-method; Accuracy; Bias; Self-enhancement; LIFE-SATISFACTION; COMPARATIVE-OPTIMISM; SELF-ENHANCEMENT; ABOVE-AVERAGE; JUDGMENT; CONVERGENT; FREQUENCY; ACCURACY; VALIDITY; RATINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103888
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article uses multi-rater data from 458 triads (students, mother, father, total N = 1374) to examine the relationship of personality ratings with wellbeing ratings, using a multi-method approach to separate accurate perceptions (shared across raters) from biased perceptions of the self (rater-specific variance). The social-psychological perspective predicts effects of halo bias in self-ratings on wellbeing, whereas the personality-psychological perspective predicts effects of personality traits on wellbeing. Results are more consistent with the personality perspective in that neuroticism (negative), extraversion, agreeableness, and to a lesser extent conscientiousness predicted wellbeing, whereas positive illusions about the self were only weakly and not significantly related to wellbeing. These results cast doubt on the hypothesis that self-enhancement is beneficial for wellbeing. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条