Ultrasonographic measurement of crown-rump length in high-order multifetal pregnancies

被引:3
|
作者
Saade, GR [1 ]
Gray, G [1 ]
Belfort, MA [1 ]
Carpenter, RJ [1 ]
Moise, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
crown-rump length; multifetal pregnancy; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11060438.x
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to evaluate the crown-rump length (CRL) in high-order multifetal Pregnancies (three or more fetuses). The records of patients who underwent multifetal pregnancy reduction were reviewed. The following parameters were defined: the mean CRL (CRLMEAN) and the difference between the largest and smallest CRL (CRLRANGE) for each pregnancy CRLMEAN was plotted Versus gestational age (GA) and the line of best fit was derived. The residual for each CRL (CRLRES) was calculated by subtracting the value predicted by the regression line from the individual CRL (CRLIND). Regression lines for singletons with confirmed GA from four previously reported studies were used for comparison. A total of 82 Patients were included (29 triplets, 38 quadruplets and 15 quintuplets; mean GA 10.7 +/- 0.78 weeks). CRLMEAN correlated with GA (CRLMEAN = 38.88 - 8.78(GA) + 0.82(GA)(2); R=0.83; R-2=0.70). This second-degree polynomial remained within the range for singletons. No significant differences in maternal age, GA and CRLMEAN were noted between the patients with different numbers of fetuses. The median CRLRANGE was largest in quintuplets, followed by quadruplets and triplets. The CRLRANGE correlated poorly with GA. The mean CRL in multifetal Pregnancies increases with GA similarly to that in singletons. The variability of individual measurements increases with the number of fetuses and CRLs are lower in quintuplets.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 444
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Standardisation of crown-rump length measurement
    Ioannou, C.
    Sarris, I.
    Hoch, L.
    Salomon, L. J.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 38 - 41
  • [2] CROWN-RUMP LENGTH - FORGOTTEN MEASUREMENT
    SEVERN, CB
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1978, 38 (03) : 393 - 393
  • [3] EMBRYONIC ULTRASONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS - CROWN-RUMP LENGTH REVISITED
    GOLDSTEIN, SR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (03) : 497 - 501
  • [4] ACCURACY OF FETAL CROWN-RUMP LENGTH MEASUREMENT BY ULTRASOUND
    ROBINSON, HP
    FLEMING, JEE
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1975, 20 (05): : 844 - 844
  • [5] THE ACCURACY OF ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL CROWN-RUMP LENGTH
    VOLLEBERGH, JHA
    JONGSMA, HW
    VANDONGEN, PWJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1989, 30 (03): : 253 - 256
  • [6] ACCURACY OF FETAL CROWN-RUMP LENGTH MEASUREMENT BY ULTRASOUND
    ROBINSON, HP
    FLEMING, JEE
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1975, 48 (570): : 510 - 510
  • [7] Twin Pregnancies, Crown-rump Length and Birthweight Discordancy: The Influence of Chorionicity
    Nunes, Joana Sousa
    Sousa, Mario
    Montenegro, Nuno
    Matias, Alexandra
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2020, 42 (09): : 529 - 534
  • [8] ULTRASONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL CROWN-RUMP LENGTH IN 1ST 18 WEEKS OF PREGNANCY
    HANSMANN, M
    SCHMELZ, G
    VOIGT, U
    ARCHIV FUR GYNAKOLOGIE, 1977, 224 (1-4): : 94 - 95
  • [9] New crown-rump length curve based on over 3500 pregnancies
    Pexsters, A.
    Daemen, A.
    Bottomley, C.
    Van Schoubroeck, D.
    de Catte, L.
    De Moor, B.
    D'Hooghe, T.
    Lees, C.
    Timmerman, D.
    Bourne, T.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 35 (06) : 650 - 655
  • [10] Fetal gender and sonographic assessment of crown-rump length: implications for multifetal pregnancy reduction
    Becker, S
    Ural, S
    Fehm, T
    Bienstock, J
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 24 (04) : 399 - 401