Embracing Complexity and Context to Improve Science Communication

被引:2
|
作者
Jakopak, Rhiannon P. [1 ]
Western, Jessica [2 ]
Monteith, Kevin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Haub Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Dept Zool & Physiol, Wyoming Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, 1000 E Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Haub Sch Environm & Nat Resources, 1000 E Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2021年 / 85卷 / 07期
关键词
mule deer; outreach; public engagement; science communication; stakeholder engagement; ungulate; CONSERVATION; DEER; MULE; PARTICIPATION; PERSPECTIVES; PERCEPTIONS; ENGAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.22106
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Members of the public play a primary role in successful implementation of wildlife management plans, making communication between scientists and the public a vital component of wildlife management. Although there is substantial public interest in the health of ungulate populations, stakeholder perspectives can vary widely, rendering a single approach to communication ineffective. To improve science communication, we characterized perspectives regarding issues negatively affecting mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in Wyoming, USA. We used Q methodology, a mixed quantitative-qualitative approach where participants ranked a series of statements followed by semi-structured interviews, to identify shared perspectives. We interviewed individuals (n = 37) representing prominent stakeholder groups (e.g., ranchers, hunters, conservation non-profits) in Wyoming. We identified 3 perspectives (52% of variance explained) that captured shared views regarding what factors are negatively affecting mule deer: bottom-up (n = 17 participants; 26% variance), human contributions (n = 9; 14% variance), and top-down (n = 8; 12% variance) perspectives. Most participants shared the idea that mule deer are being negatively affected, but participants diverged in views as to the primary issues. Perspectives ranged from being focused on bottom-up factors (e.g., habitat fragmentation, condition of winter ranges) to top-down factors (e.g., predation, disease) to factors focused on human contributions (e.g., human activity, public and political interests). Based on how participants diverged in perspectives and their interest in mule deer management, we discuss opportunities for scientists to improve communication by incorporating ecological complexity and nuance, moving towards a 2-way dialogue of communication, and sharing their own first-hand experiences in future communications with stakeholders. (c) 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Wildlife Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1320
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Embracing complexity in the science of mental disorders
    Crouse, Jacob J.
    NATURE REVIEWS PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, : 247 - 247
  • [2] Embracing complexity in social science research
    Quintana R.
    Quality & Quantity, 2023, 57 (1) : 15 - 38
  • [3] Consumer Culture Theory, Nonverbal Communication, and Contemporary Politics: Considering Context and Embracing Complexity
    Lieb, Kristin J.
    Shah, Dhavan V.
    JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 34 (02) : 127 - 136
  • [4] Consumer Culture Theory, Nonverbal Communication, and Contemporary Politics: Considering Context and Embracing Complexity
    Kristin J. Lieb
    Dhavan V. Shah
    Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 2010, 34 : 127 - 136
  • [5] Progress in Wilderness Fire Science: Embracing Complexity
    Miller, Carol
    Aplet, Gregory H.
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2016, 114 (03) : 373 - 383
  • [6] Embracing Complexity to Advance the Science of Wildland Fire Behavior
    Yedinak, Kara
    Strand, Eva
    Hiers, J.
    Varner, J.
    FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2018, 1 (02): : 1 - 8
  • [7] Getting messier with TIDieR: embracing context and complexity in intervention reporting
    Sarah Cotterill
    Sarah Knowles
    Anne-Marie Martindale
    Rebecca Elvey
    Susan Howard
    Nia Coupe
    Paul Wilson
    Michael Spence
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [8] Science communication in context
    Rogers, CL
    SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 1998, 20 (02) : 187 - 189
  • [9] Getting messier with TIDieR: embracing context and complexity in intervention reporting
    Cotterill, Sarah
    Knowles, Sarah
    Martindale, Anne-Marie
    Elvey, Rebecca
    Howard, Susan
    Coupe, Nia
    Wilson, Paul
    Spence, Michael
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [10] Embracing the future through science communication: the inaugural "Mr. Science" Science Communication Conference in China
    Wang, Guoyan
    Han, Jingyi
    Jia, Hepeng
    Yang, Yuqin
    JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 20 (05): : 1 - 5